Distinct Allelic Patterns of Nanog Expression Impart Embryonic Stem Cell Population Heterogeneity

Nanog is a principal pluripotency regulator exhibiting a disperse distribution within stem cell populations in vivo and in vitro. Increasing evidence points to a functional role of Nanog heterogeneity on stem cell fate decisions. Allelic control of Nanog gene expression was reported recently in mouse embryonic stem cells. To better understand how this mode of regulation influences the observed heterogeneity of NANOG in stem cell populations, we assembled a multiscale stochastic population balance equation framework. In addition to allelic control, gene expression noise and random partitioning at cell division were considered. As a result of allelic Nanog expression, the distribution of Nanog exhibited three distinct states but when combined with transcriptional noise the profile became bimodal. Regardless of their allelic expression pattern, initially uniform populations of stem cells gave rise to the same Nanog heterogeneity within ten cell cycles. Depletion of NANOG content in cells switching off both gene alleles was slower than the accumulation of intracellular NANOG after cells turned on at least one of their Nanog gene copies pointing to Nanog state-dependent dynamics. Allelic transcription of Nanog also raises issues regarding the use of stem cell lines with reporter genes knocked in a single allelic locus. Indeed, significant divergence was observed in the reporter and native protein profiles depending on the difference in their half-lives and insertion of the reporter gene in one or both alleles. In stem cell populations with restricted Nanog expression, allelic regulation facilitates the maintenance of fractions of self-renewing cells with sufficient Nanog content to prevent aberrant loss of pluripotency. Our findings underline the role of allelic control of Nanog expression as a prime determinant of stem cell population heterogeneity and warrant further investigation in the contexts of stem cell specification and cell reprogramming.

[1]  F. Markowetz,et al.  Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells , 2009, Nature.

[2]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[3]  E. Tzanakakis,et al.  Contribution of Stochastic Partitioning at Human Embryonic Stem Cell Division to NANOG Heterogeneity , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  H. Broxmeyer,et al.  5‐Aminoimidazole‐4‐carboxyamide Ribonucleoside Induces G1/S Arrest and Nanog Downregulation via p53 and Enhances Erythroid Differentiation , 2012, Stem cells.

[5]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[6]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Yang Xu,et al.  Modeling disease in human ESCs using an efficient BAC-based homologous recombination system. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[8]  M. Komiyama,et al.  Chemical and biological approaches to improve the efficiency of homologous recombination in human cells mediated by artificial restriction DNA cutter , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  S. Ghahramani,et al.  Fundamentals of Probability , 1995 .

[10]  O. Bensaude,et al.  Inhibiting eukaryotic transcription. Which compound to choose? How to evaluate its activity? , 2011, Transcription.

[11]  Suresh Ramakrishna,et al.  PEST motif sequence regulating human NANOG for proteasomal degradation. , 2011, Stem cells and development.

[12]  C. Tyler-Smith,et al.  Attenuation of green fluorescent protein half-life in mammalian cells. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[13]  B. Doble,et al.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.

[14]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  S. Rogers,et al.  Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis. , 1986, Science.

[16]  G. Pan,et al.  FGF2 sustains NANOG and switches the outcome of BMP4-induced human embryonic stem cell differentiation. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[17]  M. Tada,et al.  Pluripotential competence of cells associated with Nanog activity , 2005, Mechanisms of Development.

[18]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Cell Growth and Size Homeostasis in Proliferating Animal Cells , 2009, Science.

[19]  Y. Fischer,et al.  NANOG Reporter Cell Lines Generated by Gene Targeting in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  Pengbo Zhou,et al.  Determining protein half-lives. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[22]  N. Terada,et al.  A Heterogeneous Expression Pattern for Nanog in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007, Stem cells.

[23]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  C. Lim,et al.  Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.

[25]  M. Torres-Padilla,et al.  Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog , 2012, Nature.

[26]  Alfonso Martinez Arias,et al.  Filtering transcriptional noise during development: concepts and mechanisms , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  Erik Aurell,et al.  Quasi-potential landscape in complex multi-stable systems , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  T. Faniran.  Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations , 2015 .

[29]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[30]  Sean C. Bendall,et al.  Clonal isolation of hESCs reveals heterogeneity within the pluripotent stem cell compartment , 2006, Nature Methods.

[31]  F. Tang,et al.  Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[32]  Yang Luo,et al.  Cell signalling regulates dynamics of Nanog distribution in embryonic stem cell populations , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[34]  M. Trotter,et al.  Activin/Nodal signalling maintains pluripotency by controlling Nanog expression , 2009, Development.

[35]  G. Pan,et al.  NANOG is a direct target of TGFbeta/activin-mediated SMAD signaling in human ESCs. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[36]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[37]  Donghui Jing,et al.  Stem Cell Bioprocessing for Regenerative Medicine , 2011 .

[38]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[39]  L. Hyslop,et al.  Downregulation of NANOG Induces Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells to Extraembryonic Lineages , 2005, Stem cells.

[40]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Nanog Variability and Pluripotency Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cells - Insights from a Mathematical Model Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[41]  Nicola Festuccia,et al.  OCT4/SOX2‐independent Nanog autorepression modulates heterogeneous Nanog gene expression in mouse ES cells , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[42]  Chad A. Cowan,et al.  Efficient Culturing and Genetic Manipulation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  S. Kain,et al.  Generation of Destabilized Green Fluorescent Protein as a Transcription Reporter* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  F. Ma,et al.  Identification of genes regulated by nanog which is involved in ES cells pluripotency and early differentiation , 2008, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[45]  A. Trounson,et al.  Genetic modification of human embryonic stem cells for derivation of target cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[46]  K. Sidhu,et al.  Suppression of NANOG Induces Efficient Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells to Pancreatic Endoderm , 2012, Pancreas.