Comparative Study on the Numerical Methods for View Factor Computation for Packed Pebble Beds: Back Propagation Neural Network Methods Versus Monte Carlo Methods

It's an unsolved problem to calculate the thermal radiation view factors among fuel pebbles as accurately and quickly as possible in the simulation of the temperature fields within the pebble-bed. In this study, a series of fully connected neural networks (FCNs) has been developed to realize the fast calculation of view factors. In order to verify the accuracy and effects of the networks, the neural networks are compared with the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The results show that, in most cases, the relative errors of the FCN method can be controlled within 1.0%, and the prediction accurate probability is up to 99%. In comparisons of specific examples, the temperature errors of the FCN method and the MC method are less than 1 K within the range neural networks have covered. In addition, the time of neural networks for a single calculation is about 2–20 μs, which is even less than 10−4 of the time taken by the MC algorithm. In conclusion, neural networks can greatly improve computational efficiency while keeping the same accuracy as the MC algorithm, which makes real-time simulation of the temperature fields possible.

[1]  Richard P. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987 .

[2]  Hao Yu,et al.  Improved Computation for Levenberg–Marquardt Training , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[3]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[4]  Geoffrey W. Barton,et al.  Numerical Determination of Radiative View Factors Using Ray Tracing , 2010 .

[5]  W. Yuen On the utilization of the mean beam length concept in the evaluation of radiative heat transfer in isothermal three-dimensional non-gray system , 2015 .

[6]  Sadao Tanaka Exact view-factor analysis for radiation from a sphere to another sphere linked with a coaxial cylinder(MARITIME STUDIES, AND SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING) , 2008 .

[7]  Ioan Sarbu,et al.  Review on heat transfer analysis in thermal energy storage using latent heat storage systems and phase change materials , 2018, International Journal of Energy Research.

[8]  Lei Shi,et al.  An improved prediction model for the effective thermal conductivity of compact pebble bed reactors , 2017 .

[9]  Zheng. Li,et al.  Nonlinear fitting by using a neural net algorithm , 1993 .

[10]  J. Ji,et al.  Monte Carlo calculation model for heat radiation of inclined cylindrical flames and its application , 2017 .

[11]  A. Saboonchi,et al.  View factor calculation using the Monte Carlo method for a 3D strip element to circular cylinder , 2011 .

[12]  Li Zhou,et al.  Monte Carlo calculation of view factors between some complex surfaces: Rectangular plane and parallel cylinder, rectangular plane and torus, especially cold-rolled strip and W-shaped radiant tube in continuous annealing furnace , 2018, International Journal of Thermal Sciences.

[13]  J. Tu,et al.  A review of pebble flow study for pebble bed high temperature gas-cooled reactor , 2019, Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow.

[14]  Walter W. Yuen,et al.  RAD-NNET, a neural network based correlation developed for a realistic simulation of the non-gray radiative heat transfer effect in three-dimensional gas-particle mixtures , 2009 .

[15]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  Assessment of radiative heat transfer characteristics of a combustion mixture in a three-dimensional enclosure using RAD-NETT (with application to a fire resistance test furnace) , 2014 .

[16]  B.M. Wilamowski,et al.  Neural network architectures and learning algorithms , 2009, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[17]  P. G. Rousseau,et al.  Multi-sphere Unit Cell model to calculate the effective thermal conductivity in packed pebble beds of mono-sized spheres , 2012 .

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[19]  George N Walton,et al.  Calculation of obstructed view factors by adaptive integration , 2002 .

[20]  N. P. Lavery,et al.  Numerical Sensitivity and View Factor Calculation Using the Monte Carlo Method , 2006 .

[21]  R. Moradi,et al.  Application of Neural Network for estimation of heat transfer treatment of Al2O3-H2O nanofluid through a channel , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[22]  J. Tu,et al.  A matrix model of particle-scale radiative heat transfer in structured and randomly packed pebble bed , 2020 .

[23]  Nan Gui,et al.  Effect of scale on the modeling of radiation heat transfer in packed pebble beds , 2016 .