Assessing the magnetosphere's nonlinear behavior: Its dimension is low, its predictability, high

The complexity of magnetospheric dynamics arises from a number of physical processes extending from the sun to the ionosphere and encompasses many space and time scales. Ground-based and spacecraft observations have shown irregularity in magnetospheric dynamics, and their interpretation using the conventional tools such as the linear prediction filters has led to many interesting results. Recent developments in the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems that exhibit such irregular behavior have led to new techniques of reconstructing the intrinsic phase space structure using time series data. The key advantage of these techniques is their ability to yield the inherent dynamical characteristics of the system as represented in the observational data, independent of particular modeling assumptions. The basis for this approach is the realization that seemingly irregular behavior does not necessarily require a complex dynamical or statistical description, but can be understood from simple models containing nonlinearities. Thus a physical system that exhibits complex behavior may be a deterministic dynamical system with a few significant degrees of freedom. Such a possibility, among others, have led to a variety of techniques in the study of nonlinear phenomena.

[1]  Theiler,et al.  Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[2]  Dean Prichard,et al.  Is the AE index the result of nonlinear dynamics , 1993 .

[3]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Magnetospheric Impulse Response for Many Levels of Geomagnetic Activity , 1985 .

[4]  L. Tsimring,et al.  The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems , 1993 .

[5]  J. Bischoff,et al.  Nonlinear input/output analysis of the auroral electrojet index , 1994 .

[6]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Estimation of the Kolmogorov entropy from a chaotic signal , 1983 .

[7]  A. Sharma,et al.  An empirical model relating the auroral geomagnetic activity to the interplanetary magnetic field , 1993 .

[8]  Toshiki Tajima,et al.  Neural net forecasting for geomagnetic activity , 1993 .

[9]  C. Goertz,et al.  Chaotic appearance of the AE index , 1991 .

[10]  D. Baker,et al.  Linear prediction filters for linear and nonlinear modeled geomagnetic activity , 1991 .

[11]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[12]  R. McPherron,et al.  Comment on “Prediction of geomagnetic activity” by C. K. Goertz, Lin‐Hua Shan, and R. A. Smith , 1993 .

[13]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  The evolution from weak to strong geomagnetic activity: an interpretation in terms of deterministic chaos , 1990 .

[14]  R. McPherron,et al.  7 – Physical Processes Producing Magnetospheric Substorms and Magnetic Storms , 1991 .

[15]  A. Sharma,et al.  Time Series Analysis of Magnetospheric Activity Using Nonlinear Dynamical Methods , 1992 .

[16]  Floris Takens,et al.  On the numerical determination of the dimension of an attractor , 1985 .

[17]  D. Baker,et al.  Examination of time‐variable input effects in a nonlinear analogue magnetosphere model , 1991 .

[18]  G. P. King,et al.  Extracting qualitative dynamics from experimental data , 1986 .

[19]  R. McPherron,et al.  A bimodal representation of the response function relating the solar wind electric field to the AL index , 1993 .

[20]  Dean Prichard,et al.  The correlation dimension of differenced data , 1994, comp-gas/9405005.

[21]  Konstantinos Papadopoulos,et al.  Reconstruction of low‐dimensional magnetospheric dynamics by singular spectrum analysis , 1993 .

[22]  William A. Brock,et al.  Nonlinearity And Complex Dynamics In Economics And Finance , 1988 .

[23]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Indications of low dimensionality in magnetospheric dynamics , 1991 .

[24]  B. Reynard,et al.  Raman spectroscopy at mantle pressure and temperature conditions experimental set-up and the example , 1993 .

[25]  G. Siscoe The magnetosphere: A union of interdependent parts , 1991 .

[26]  D. Prichard,et al.  The non‐linear response of the magnetosphere: 30 October 1978 , 1993, comp-gas/9305003.

[27]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Prediction of geomagnetic activity , 1993 .

[28]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[29]  D. Roberts,et al.  Is there a strange attractor in the magnetosphere , 1991 .

[30]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Geometry from a Time Series , 1980 .

[31]  D. Prichard,et al.  Spurious dimension estimates from time series of geomagnetic indices , 1992 .

[32]  D. Baker,et al.  Re-examination of driven and unloading aspects of magnetospheric substorms , 1993 .

[33]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  A description of the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling based on nonlinear filters , 1995 .

[34]  Farmer,et al.  Predicting chaotic time series. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[35]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Substorm recurrence during steady and variable solar wind driving: Evidence for a normal mode in the unloading dynamics of the magnetosphere , 1994 .

[36]  On the embedding‐dimension analysis of AE and AL time series , 1991 .

[37]  Konstantinos Papadopoulos,et al.  Low-dimensional chaos in magnetospheric activity from AE time series , 1990 .

[38]  Tom Chang,et al.  Low-dimensional behavior and symmetry breaking of stochastic systems near criticality-can these effects be observed in space and in the laboratory? , 1992 .

[39]  Lyapunov exponent of magnetospheric activity from AL time series , 1991 .

[40]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  A nonlinear dynamical analogue model of geomagnetic activity , 1992 .