Large-scale evaluation of a single-tube nested PCR for the laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis in Kuwait.

A single-tube nested PCR assay identifying a 52 bp fragment from the genus-specific Brucella IS711 gene was used prospectively in clinical practice for the diagnosis of human brucellosis in Kuwait. Patients with suspected brucellosis and with other infections were investigated as clinically indicated but in all of them culture, serology and PCR for Brucella were carried out. Out of 263 suspected cases of brucellosis, diagnostic tests were positive in 199, serology was positive in 199 and culture in 89, while the Brucella PCR was positive in 193 (sensitivity 96.98%, 95% confidence interval 94.5-99.5%). Chronic brucellosis, involving symptoms for more than 1 year, was diagnosed in 49 out of these 193 patients. Diagnoses in four out of the six patients with positive serology but negative PCR and culture were non-Brucella bacterial meningitis and viral meningitis. False-negative PCR results were possible in the remaining two; both had been on long-term antibiotics for previously diagnosed brucellosis but their adherence may have been questionable, allowing a relapse. The PCR was negative in 244 patients with other infections (specificity 100%) and in 180 control subjects with negative Brucella culture and serology. PCR results were available within 24 h of sample receipt, providing diagnostic information rapidly. The PCR is expensive and technically demanding and may not be appropriate for all cases. Future studies will help define how it may best be used. For example Brucella and tuberculous meningitides can be very similar, Brucella PCR may allow prompt distinction between the two, avoiding the need for prolonged empirical treatment for both.

[1]  M. Queipo-Ortuño,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a PCR-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  S. Wright,et al.  Single-tube, nested PCR for the diagnosis of human brucellosis in Kuwait , 2002, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[3]  E. J. Young,et al.  Immunology of Brucellosis , 2001 .

[4]  P. Ocón,et al.  Rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis by peripheral-blood PCR assay , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  Z. Memish,et al.  Rapid diagnosis of Brucella bacteremia by using the BACTEC 9240 system , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[6]  J. Liautard,et al.  IS6501-anchored PCR for the detection and identification of Brucella species and strains. , 1996, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[7]  G. Matar,et al.  Rapid laboratory confirmation of human brucellosis by PCR analysis of a target sequence on the 31-kilodalton Brucella antigen DNA , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[8]  B. Bricker,et al.  Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[9]  B. Drasar,et al.  Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. , 1992, The Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[10]  E. Kawasaki 18 – SAMPLE PREPARATION FROM BLOOD, CELLS, AND OTHER FLUIDS , 1990 .

[11]  A. Al-Aska,et al.  Laboratory-acquired brucellosis. , 1989, The Journal of hospital infection.

[12]  A. Mousa,et al.  The nature of human brucellosis in Kuwait: study of 379 cases. , 1988, Reviews of infectious diseases.

[13]  G. Araj,et al.  Human brucellosis in Kuwait: a prospective study of 400 cases. , 1988, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Hutton (a) Epidemiological Aspects , 1950 .