Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry

Binocular rivalry is thought to arise from a low-level cortical site. Experiment 1 evaluates this claim with respect to local and global motion processing by using a multiple-aperture motion stimulus and measuring the predominance of global coherence while one of the component gratings is engaged in rivalry. Results show that rivalry suppression of the component grating precludes global coherence. Presumable, suppression prevents the component motion signal from advancing to higher-level global motion areas, suggesting rivalry occurs between local and global motion processing. However, feedback from higher-level mechanisms might exert an influence on binocular rivalry and thus Experiment 2 measures how the predominance of a local target engaged in binocular rivalry with a competing local stimulus is affected when the target forms part of a globally coherent motion stimulus. The augmented level of target predominance during global motion relative to local motion indicates that higher-level motion mechanisms can feedback and influence the binocular rivalry process. Together, these data imply a looping hierarchy of motion processing stages, with rivalry suppression transpiring at an intermediate level and subject to feedback from higher-level motion areas.

[1]  R. Blake Psychoanatomical strategies for studying human visual perception , 1995 .

[2]  D. Burr,et al.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion , 1995, Nature.

[3]  B. Wandell Foundations of vision , 1995 .

[4]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  R. Blake A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[6]  R. Blake,et al.  The neural site of binocular rivalry relative to the analysis of motion in the human visual system , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Motion Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[9]  R Blake,et al.  Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  R. Fox,et al.  Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion aftereffect , 1975, Vision Research.

[11]  P. Whittle,et al.  Some experiments on figural effects in binocular rivalry , 1968 .

[12]  D. Alais,et al.  Reduction of a pattern-induced motion aftereffect by binocular rivalry suggests the involvement of extrastriate mechanisms , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[13]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[14]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The influence of terminators on motion integration across space , 1992, Vision Research.

[15]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. , 1992, Science.

[16]  R. Fox,et al.  Binocular rivalry and reciprocal inhibition , 1969 .

[17]  R. Blake,et al.  Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  R. Blake,et al.  The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  M. Hollins,et al.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[21]  R. P. O'Shea,et al.  Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect is not reduced by binocular rivalry , 1981, Vision Research.

[22]  I. Kovács,et al.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  R. Blake Threshold conditions for binocular rivalry. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  David Alais,et al.  Local and global factors affecting the coherent motion of gratings presented in multiple apertures , 1998, Vision Research.

[25]  N. Logothetis,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry , 1996 .

[26]  T. Papathomas Early vision and beyond , 1995 .

[27]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Apparent motion can survive binocular rivalry suppression , 1991, Vision Research.