Language Experience and the Organization of Brain Activity to Phonetically Similar Words: ERP Evidence from 14- and 20-Month-Olds

The ability to discriminate phonetically similar speech sounds is evident quite early in development. However, inexperienced word learners do not always use this information in processing word meanings Stager & Werker (1997). Nature, 388, 381382. The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine developmental changes from 14 to 20 months in brain activity important in processing phonetic detail in the context of meaningful words. ERPs were compared to three types of words: words whose meanings were known by the child (e.g., bear), nonsense words that differed by an initial phoneme (e.g., gare), and nonsense words that differed from the known words by more than one phoneme (e.g., kobe). These results supported the behavioral findings suggesting that inexperienced word learners do not use information about phonetic detail when processing word meanings. For the 14-month-olds, ERPs to known words (e.g., bear) differed from ERPs to phonetically dissimilar nonsense words (e.g., kobe), but did not differ from ERPs to phonetically similar nonsense words (e.g., gare), suggesting that known words and similar mispronunciations were processed as the same word. In contrast, for experienced word learners (i.e., 20-month-olds), ERPs to known words (e.g., bear) differed from those to both types of nonsense words (gare and kobe). Changes in the lateral distribution of ERP differences to known and unknown (nonce) words between 14 and 20 months replicated previous findings. The findings suggested that vocabulary development is an important factor in the organization of neural systems linked to processing phonetic detail within the context of word comprehension.

[1]  Pierre A. Hallé,et al.  The format of representation of recognized words in infants' early receptive lexicon , 1996 .

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants , 1994, Nature.

[3]  J. Werker,et al.  Early Word Learners' Ability to Access Phonetic Detail in Well-Known Words , 2003, Language and speech.

[4]  J. Richards,et al.  Testing neural models of the development of infant visual attention. , 2002, Developmental psychobiology.

[5]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[6]  A. Friederici,et al.  Lexical priming and semantic integration reflected in the event-related potential of 14-month-olds , 2005, Neuroreport.

[7]  Pierre A. Hallé,et al.  Emergence of an early receptive lexicon: Infants' recognition of words , 1994 .

[8]  R. Aslin,et al.  Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children , 2000, Cognition.

[9]  D. Molfese,et al.  Known versus unknown word discriminations in 12‐month‐old human infants: Electrophysiological correlates , 1993 .

[10]  D. Swingley,et al.  Phonetic Detail in the Developing Lexicon , 2003, Language and speech.

[11]  H. Neville,et al.  Language Acquisition and Cerebral Specialization in 20-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  H. Neville,et al.  Visual and auditory sentence processing: A developmental analysis using event‐related brain potentials , 1992 .

[13]  K Alho,et al.  Phonological aspects of word recognition as revealed by high-resolution spatio-temporal brain mapping , 2001, Neuroreport.

[14]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Phonological specificity in early words , 2002 .

[15]  S. Sereno,et al.  Context Effects in Word Recognition , 2003, Psychological science.

[16]  Dennis L. Molfese,et al.  Auditory evoked responses recorded from 16-month-old human infants to words they did and did not know , 1990, Brain and Language.

[17]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Early Speech Perception and Later Language Development: Implications for the "Critical Period" , 2005 .

[18]  D. Mills,et al.  Do changes in brain organization reflect shifts in symbolic functioning , 2005 .

[19]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  M. Casasola,et al.  Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[21]  D. Mills,et al.  Two languages, one developing brain: event-related potentials to words in bilingual toddlers. , 2006, Developmental science.

[22]  Dennis L. Molfese,et al.  Auditory evoked responses to names for different objects: Cross-modal processing as a basis for infant language acquisition. , 1990 .

[23]  D. Molfese.  Electrophysiological correlates of word meanings in 14-month-old human infants , 1989 .

[24]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  61 Postlexical Integration Processes in Language Comprehension : Evidence from Brain-Imaging Research , 2002 .

[25]  K. Plunkett,et al.  Watching the Infant Brain Learn Words: Effects of Vocabulary Size and Experience. , 2005 .

[26]  J. Werker,et al.  Infants' Ability to Learn Phonetically Similar Words: Effects of Age and Vocabulary Size , 2002 .

[27]  John P. Pinto,et al.  When half a word is enough: infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. , 2001, Child development.

[28]  J. Werker,et al.  Listening to Sounds versus Listening to Words: Early Steps in Word Learning. , 2004 .

[29]  J. Bertoncini,et al.  Before and after the vocabulary spurt: two modes of word acquisition? , 2003 .

[30]  J. Werker,et al.  Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. , 2005, Developmental psychobiology.

[31]  J. Mehler,et al.  Syllables as units in infant speech perception , 1981 .

[32]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  R. Aslin,et al.  Lexical Neighborhoods and the Word-Form Representations of 14-Month-Olds , 2002, Psychological science.

[34]  D. Molfese,et al.  Consonant discrimination by newborn infants: Electrophysiological differences , 1991 .

[35]  C. Brown,et al.  The role of feature geometry in the development of phonemic contrasts , 1997 .

[36]  P. Simos,et al.  Behavioral and Electrophysiological Indices of Voicing-Cue Discrimination: Laterality Patterns and Development , 1997, Brain and Language.

[37]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Form is easy, meaning is hard: resolving a paradox in early child language , 2002, Cognition.

[38]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971, Science.

[39]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Variability in early communicative development. , 1994, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[40]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[41]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz.  Cerebral Specialization for Speech and Non-Speech Stimuli in Infants , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event related potentials and language comprehension. , 1995 .

[43]  P. Jusczyk.  The discovery of spoken language , 1997 .

[44]  D. Molfese,et al.  Right-hemisphere responses from preschool children to temporal cues to speech and nonspeech materials: Electrophysiological correlates , 1988, Brain and Language.

[45]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[46]  J. Werker,et al.  Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks , 1997, Nature.

[47]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Phonotactic Knowledge and Lexical-Semantic Processing in One-year-olds: Brain Responses to Words and Nonsense Words in Picture Contexts , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months , 1997 .