17 Persuasion and Attitude Change

Attitudes refer to people's general evaluations. Attitudes vary in whether they have a primarily affective or cognitive basis, and whether they come to mind automatically or only with some degree of reflection. After articulating these features of attitudes, we present an organizing framework for understanding the processes responsible for persuasion. These processes are divided into those that emphasize effortful thinking about the merits of the attitude object versus those that rely on less cognitively demanding processes. This allows understanding and prediction of what variables affect attitudes and in what situations. In addition, this framework helps to place the various specific theories of attitude change in their proper domain of operation. For example, high-effort processes such as cognitive responses or dissonance account for attitude change when thinking is high, whereas lower-effort processes such as classical conditioning or the use of simple heuristics account for attitude change when thinking is low. Finally, recognition of high- versus low-effort mechanisms of change permits predictions about the strength of attitudes modified by different processes. Attitudes that are changed as a result of considerable mental effort tend to be more durable and impactful than attitudes changed with low effort. Keywords: attitude change; persuasion; elaboration; evaluation

[1]  R. Lutz An Experimental Investigation of Causal Relations Among Cognitions, Affect, and Behavioral Intention , 1977 .

[2]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[3]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Self-enhancement and theory-based correction processes , 2010 .

[4]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Kenneth G. DeMarree,et al.  Self-Ambivalence and Resistance to Subtle Self-Change Attempts , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  I. Janis,et al.  The influence of role playing on opinion change. , 1954, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  Self-Referencing , 1989 .

[9]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Ego-Involvement and Persuasion: An Appreciative Look at the Sherif’s Contribution to the Study of Self-Relevance and Attitude Change , 1992 .

[10]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[11]  R. Petty,et al.  Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a "don't remind me" effect. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  R. Petty,et al.  The impact of perceived message complexity and need for cognition on information processing and attitudes , 2009 .

[14]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Some Contemporary Approaches , 1964 .

[15]  M. Banaji,et al.  PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT 1 RUNNING HEAD : PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test : III . Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity , 2006 .

[16]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context-Induced Contrast , 1993 .

[17]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  What's in a frame anyway?: A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty , 2008 .

[18]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Celerity and Cajolery: Rapid Speech May Promote or Inhibit Persuasion through its Impact on Message Elaboration , 1991 .

[19]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Subliminal Conditioning of Attitudes , 1992 .

[20]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  D. Gilbert How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[22]  Kenneth G. DeMarree,et al.  Understanding the Role of the Self in Prime-to-Behavior Effects: The Active-Self Account , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[23]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Marlone D. Henderson,et al.  Does Fast or Slow Evaluation Foster Greater Certainty? , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[25]  I. Martin,et al.  The evaluative response: primitive but necessary. , 1994, Behaviour research and therapy.

[26]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[27]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[28]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  K. Edwards,et al.  The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation and Change , 1990 .

[30]  W. M. Guire 7 – Personality and Attitude Change: An Information-Processing Theory , 1968 .

[31]  R. Petty,et al.  When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion , 2006 .

[32]  M. Heesacker,et al.  Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. , 1981 .

[33]  R. Petty,et al.  The need to evaluate. , 1996 .

[34]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. , 1994 .

[35]  R. Petty,et al.  Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny , 1995 .

[36]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Expectancy-value attitude models: An analysis of critical theoretical issues , 1985 .

[38]  S. Valins Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Jane L. Risen,et al.  How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A model of dual attitudes. , 2000, Psychological review.

[41]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[42]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Overt head movements and persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Perceptions of source efficacy and persuasion: Multiple mechanisms for source effects on attitudes , 2011 .

[44]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[45]  C A Kiesler,et al.  Positive and negative attitudinal affect established by classical conditioning. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  R. Petty,et al.  The Role of the Affective and Cognitive Bases of Attitudes in Susceptibility to Affectively and Cognitively Based Persuasion , 1999 .

[47]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  J. Cooper,et al.  A Self-Standards Model of Cognitive Dissonance , 2001 .

[49]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: An attitude strength perspective. , 2004 .

[50]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and complexity of thought. , 1983 .

[51]  David J. Klein,et al.  Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments , 1994 .

[52]  A. Greenwald 6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[53]  R. Petty,et al.  Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions , 1993 .

[54]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  Shelley E. Taylor On inferring one's attitudes from one's behavior: Some delimiting conditions. , 1975 .

[56]  N. Anderson Integration theory and attitude change. , 1971 .

[57]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort Justification , 1976 .

[58]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  The Effect of Regulatory Depletion on Attitude Certainty , 2010 .

[59]  J Cooper,et al.  Dissonance and the pill: an attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: the Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why we Feel the Way we Do , 1989 .

[61]  P. Vernon,et al.  The heritability of attitudes: a study of twins. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Noncognitive Effects on Attitude Formation and Change: Fact or Artifact? , 1995 .

[63]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. , 1973 .

[64]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot , 2002 .

[65]  N. Schwarz Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. , 1999 .

[66]  H. Plessner,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Betsch et al. / IMPLICIT ATTITUDE FORMATION I Like It but I Don’t Know Why: A Value-Account Approach to Implicit Attitude Formation , 2022 .

[67]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Dissonance and Self-perception: An integrative View of Each Theory's Proper Domain of Application , 1977 .

[68]  D. Mackie,et al.  Of Two Minds , 2006, Psychological science.

[69]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production , 1967 .

[70]  F. Strack,et al.  Mood and Persuasion , 1990 .

[71]  Olesya Govorun,et al.  An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[72]  T. Zentall Justification of Effort by Humans and Pigeons , 2010 .

[73]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[74]  R. Petty,et al.  Ease of Retrieval Effects in Persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis , 2002 .

[75]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[77]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  On-Line Versus Memory-Based Processing: The Role of “Need to Evaluate” in Person Perception , 2001 .

[78]  G. Bower Mood and memory. , 1981, The American psychologist.

[79]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of extent of thought on the pleasantness ratings of p-o-x triads: Evidence for three judgmental tendencies in evaluating social situations. , 1981 .

[80]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. , 1959 .

[81]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[82]  A. Dijksterhuis,et al.  Effect of Social Category Priming on Personal Attitudes , 2003, Psychological science.

[83]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[84]  H. Arkes,et al.  Determinants of judged validity. , 1991 .

[85]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Persuasion by a Single Route: A View From the Unimodel , 1999 .

[86]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[87]  Multiple Motives and Persuasive Communication: Creative Elaboration as a Result of Impression Motivation and Accuracy Motivation , 2001 .

[88]  W. Wood Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. , 1982 .

[89]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[90]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[91]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivational effects in the mere-exposure paradigm , 1996 .

[92]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[93]  R. Petty,et al.  lhe Effects of Overt Head Movements on Persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of Responses , 1980 .

[94]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming Famous Overnight: Limits on the Ability to Avoid Unconscious Influences of the Past , 1989 .

[95]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message Repetition on Argument Processing, Recall, and Persuasion , 1989 .

[96]  A. Field I Like It, but I'm Not Sure Why: Can Evaluative Conditioning Occur without Conscious Awareness? , 2000, Consciousness and Cognition.

[97]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The Automatic Evaluation of Novel Stimuli , 2002, Psychological science.

[98]  J. Dovidio,et al.  On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes , 1997 .

[99]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[100]  George Y. Bizer,et al.  Self‐Schema Matching and Attitude Change: Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Message Elaboration , 2005 .

[101]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. , 1999 .

[102]  N. Schwarz Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[103]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[104]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[105]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. , 1987 .

[106]  R. Wyer,et al.  Elaborative and Nonelaborative Processing of a Behavior-Related Communication , 2001 .

[107]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. , 1979 .

[108]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of Attitudes: Implications for Attitude Measurement, Change, and Strength , 2007 .

[109]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[110]  Zakary L. Tormala,et al.  A self-validation perspective on the mere thought effect , 2011 .

[111]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[112]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[113]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[114]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  The measurement of opinion. , 1928 .

[115]  J. Brehm Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[116]  A. Staats,et al.  First-order conditioning of meaning and the parallel conditioning of a GSR. , 1962, The Journal of general psychology.

[117]  Robert J. Rydell,et al.  Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: a systems of reasoning analysis. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[118]  J. Cooper Personal responsibility and dissonance: The role of foreseen consequences. , 1971 .

[119]  A G Greenwald,et al.  Acceptance and recall of improvised arguments. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[120]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of Forwarning of Persuasive Intent and Involvement on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion , 1979 .

[121]  George Y. Bizer,et al.  Is There One Persuasion Process or More? Lumping Versus Splitting in Attitude Change Theories , 1999 .

[122]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Balance, agreement, and attraction in hypothetical social situations , 1976 .

[123]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[124]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[125]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .