The depth of porphyrin in a membrane and the membrane's physical properties affect the photosensitizing efficiency.

Photosensitized biological processes, as applied in photodynamic therapy, are based on light-triggered generation of molecular singlet oxygen by a membrane-residing sensitizer. Most of the sensitizers currently used are hydrophobic or amphiphilic porphyrins and their analogs. The possible activity of the short-lived singlet oxygen is limited to the time it is diffusing in the membrane, before it emerges into the aqueous environment. In this paper we demonstrate the enhancement of the photosensitization process that is obtained by newly synthesized protoporphyrin derivatives, which insert their tetrapyrrole chromophore deeper into the lipid bilayer of liposomes. The insertion was measured by fluorescence quenching by iodide and the photosensitization efficiency was measured with 9,10-dimethylanthracene, a fluorescent chemical target for singlet oxygen. We also show that when the bilayer undergoes a melting phase transition, or when it is fluidized by benzyl alcohol, the sensitization efficiency decreases because of the enhanced diffusion of singlet oxygen. The addition of cholesterol or of dimyristoyl phosphatydilcholine to the bilayer moves the porphyrin deeper into the bilayer; however, the ensuing effect on the sensitization efficiency is different in these two cases. These results could possibly define an additional criterion for the choice and design of hydrophobic, membrane-bound photosensitizers.

[1]  R. Cubeddu,et al.  Porphyrins in Tumor Phototherapy , 1984 .

[2]  J. Vanderkooi,et al.  Oxygen diffusion in biological and artificial membranes determined by the fluorochrome pyrene , 1975, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  J. McCaughan OVERVIEW OF EXPERIENCES WITH PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY FOR MALIGNANCY IN 192 PATIENTS , 1987, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[4]  M. Rodgers,et al.  Current perspectives of singlet oxygen detection in biological environments. , 1992, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[5]  J. Leriche,et al.  A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SAFETY and EFFICACY OF PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY USING PHOTOFRIN II COMBINED WITH PALLIATIVE RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS PALLIATIVE RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH INOPERABLE OBSTRUCTIVE NON‐SMALL CELL BRONCHOGENIC CARCINOMA , 1987, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[6]  Y. Barenholz,et al.  Organization and dynamics of pyrene and pyrene lipids in intact lipid bilayers. Photo-induced charge transfer processes. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[7]  F. Goñi,et al.  Fluorescence quenching at interfaces and the permeation of acrylamide and iodide across phospholipid bilayers , 1993, FEBS letters.

[8]  P Jones,et al.  Equilibrium and kinetic studies of the aggregation of porphyrins in aqueous solution. , 1976, The Biochemical journal.

[9]  E. Quiñones,et al.  Fluorescence quenching of pyrene derivatives by iodide compounds in erythrocyte membranes: an approach of the probe location , 1995 .

[10]  S. Lehrer Solute perturbation of protein fluorescence. The quenching of the tryptophyl fluorescence of model compounds and of lysozyme by iodide ion. , 1971, Biochemistry.

[11]  J. Zou,et al.  Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of malignant tumours: an analysis of 540 cases. , 1990, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[12]  Z. Malik,et al.  Destruction of erythroleukemia, myelocytic leukemia and burkitt lymphoma cells by photoactivated protoporphyrin , 1980, International journal of cancer.

[13]  J. Levy,et al.  Photosensitizers as virucidal agents. , 1993, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[14]  F. Wilkinson,et al.  Rate constants for the decay and reactions of the lowest electronically excited singlet state of molecular oxygen in solution , 1981 .

[15]  B. Ehrenberg,et al.  The partition and distribution of porphyrins in liposomal membranes. A spectroscopic study. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[16]  R. Lufkin,et al.  Future directions of laser phototherapy for diagnosis and treatment of malignancies: Fantasy, fallacy, or reality? , 1991 .

[17]  T. Dubbelman,et al.  Photodynamic treatment of yeast cells with the dye toluidine blue: all-or-none loss of plasma membrane barrier properties. , 1992, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  E. London,et al.  Anchoring of tryptophan and tyrosine analogs at the hydrocarbon-polar boundary in model membrane vesicles: parallax analysis of fluorescence quenching induced by nitroxide-labeled phospholipids. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[19]  T. Dougherty,et al.  HOW DOES PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WORK? , 1992, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[20]  S. Bown,et al.  Photodynamic therapy to scientists and clinicians--one world or two? , 1990, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[21]  E. London,et al.  Control of the depth of molecules within membranes by polar groups: determination of the location of anthracene-labeled probes in model membranes by parallax analysis of nitroxide-labeled phospholipid induced fluorescence quenching. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[22]  J Moan,et al.  PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY OF CANCER: EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH , 1992, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[23]  B. Ehrenberg,et al.  Liposome binding constants and singlet oxygen quantum yields of hypericin, tetrahydroxy helianthrone and their derivatives: studies in organic solutions and in liposomes. , 2000, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[24]  D. Kessel,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PORPHYRIN‐SENSITIZED PHOTOOXIDATION CHARACTERIZED BY FLUORESCENCE AND ABSORPTION SPECTRA , 1982 .

[25]  E. Ben-hur,et al.  ADVANCES IN PHOTOCHEMICAL APPROACHES FOR BLOOD STERILIZATION , 1995, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[26]  P Baas,et al.  Photodynamic therapy: a promising new modality for the treatment of cancer. , 1996, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[27]  Z. Malik,et al.  Electric depolarization of photosensitized cells: lipid vs. protein alterations. , 1993, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  J Moan,et al.  Intracellular localization of photosensitizers. , 1989, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[29]  Z. Wasylewski,et al.  A fluorescence quenching study on protoporphyrin IX in a model membrane system. , 1996, Chemistry and physics of lipids.

[30]  J Moan,et al.  Lysosomes and Microtubules as Targets for Photochemotherapy of Cancer , 1997, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[31]  E. London,et al.  Extension of the parallax analysis of membrane penetration depth to the polar region of model membranes: use of fluorescence quenching by a spin-label attached to the phospholipid polar headgroup. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[32]  T J Dougherty,et al.  PHOTOSENSITIZERS: THERAPY AND DETECTION OF MALIGNANT TUMORS , 1987, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[33]  G. Klose Biomembranes, Physical Aspects , 1996 .

[34]  H. Tanke,et al.  PHOTODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF HEMATOPORPHYRIN DERIVATIVE ON THE UPTAKE OF RHODAMINE 123 BY MITOCHONDRIA OF INTACT MURINE L929 FIBROBLASTS AND CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY Kl CELLS , 1988, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[35]  J W Winkelman,et al.  PHOTOSENSITIZERS IN ORGANIZED MEDIA: SINGLET OXYGEN PRODUCTION AND SPECTRAL PROPERTIES , 1988, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[36]  B. Ehrenberg Assessment of the partitioning of probes to membranes by spectroscopic titration. , 1992, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[37]  S. Dearden Kinetics of O2(1Δg) photo-oxidation reactions in egg-yolk lecithin vesicles , 1986 .

[38]  C. Gomer PRECLINICAL EXAMINATION OF FIRST and SECOND GENERATION PHOTOSENSITIZERS USED IN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY , 1991, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[39]  Roger Guilard,et al.  The porphyrin handbook , 2002 .

[40]  R. Pottier,et al.  The photochemistry of haematoporphyrin and related systems. , 1986, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[41]  T. McIntosh,et al.  Influence of cholesterol on water penetration into bilayers. , 1982, Science.

[42]  D. Kessel,et al.  HEMATOPORPHYRIN and HPD: PHOTOPHYSICS, PHOTOCHEMISTRY and PHOTOTHERAPY , 1984, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[43]  A. Ho,et al.  The use of photodynamic therapy in bone marrow purging. , 1994, Seminars in oncology.

[44]  S. Hui,et al.  Iodide penetration into lipid bilayers as a probe of membrane lipid organization. , 1991, Chemistry and physics of lipids.

[45]  J. Piette,et al.  Photosensitized production of singlet oxygen by merocyanine 540 bound to liposomes. , 1991, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[46]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  The localisation of small molecules in lipid bilayers , 1972, FEBS letters.

[47]  E. London,et al.  Parallax method for direct measurement of membrane penetration depth utilizing fluorescence quenching by spin-labeled phospholipids. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[48]  Z. Malik,et al.  FLUORESCENCE SPECTRAL CHANGES OF HEMATOPORPHYRIN DERIVATIVE UPON BINDING TO LIPID VESICLES, Staphylococcus aureus AND Escherichia coli CELLS , 1985, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[49]  M. Rodgers,et al.  Plasma membrane depolarization and calcium influx during cell injury by photodynamic action. , 1991, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[50]  M. Shinitzky,et al.  Selective release of integral proteins from human erythrocyte membranes by hydrostatic pressure. , 1985, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[51]  H. Kutchai,et al.  Perturbation of egg phosphatidylcholine and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine multilamellar vesicles by n-alkanols. A fluorescent probe study. , 1985, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[52]  Meir Shinitzky,et al.  Physiology of membrane fluidity , 1984 .

[53]  M. Shinitzky,et al.  Microviscosity parameters and protein mobility in biological membranes. , 1976, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[54]  Y. Usui DETERMINATION OF QUANTUM YIELD OF SINGLET OXYGEN FORMATION BY PHOTOSENSITIZATION , 1973 .

[55]  W.Phillip Helman,et al.  Rate Constants for the Decay and Reactions of the Lowest Electronically Excited Singlet State of Molecular Oxygen in Solution. An Expanded and Revised Compilation , 1995 .

[56]  J. Kanofsky,et al.  Singlet oxygen production by biological systems. , 1989, Chemico-biological interactions.

[57]  U. Cogan,et al.  Microviscosity and order in the hydrocarbon region of phospholipid and phospholipid-cholesterol dispersions determined with fluorescent probes. , 1973, Biochemistry.

[58]  B. Ehrenberg,et al.  SINGLET OXYGEN GENERATION BY PORPHYRINS AND THE KINETICS OF 9,10‐DIMETHYLANTHRACENE PHOTOSENSITIZATION IN LIPOSOMES , 1993, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[59]  B. Ehrenberg,et al.  Kinetics and Yield of Singlet Oxygen Photosensitized by Hypericin in Organic and Biological Media , 1998, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[60]  M. Rodgers On the problems involved in detecting luminescence from singlet oxygen in biological specimens. , 1988, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[61]  B. Ehrenberg,et al.  THE EFFECT OF LIPOSOMES' MEMBRANE COMPOSITION ON THE BINDING OF THE PHOTOSENSITIZERS HPD AND PHOTOFRIN II , 1988, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[62]  E. Corey,et al.  A Study of the Peroxidation of Organic Compounds by Externally Generated Singlet Oxygen Molecules , 1964 .

[63]  G. Bock,et al.  Photosensitizing compounds : their chemistry, biology and clinical use , 1989 .