Short-Term Congestion Management by Strategic Application of FACTS Devices and Demand Response Programs Under Contingency Conditions

ABSTRACT This paper explores the use of combination of flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) devices, demand response (DR) programs, and generation redispatch (GR) in short-term congestion management as well as minimization of operation costs under contingency conditions in power systems. To achieve this, a multi-stage market clearing procedure is formulated. At the first stage, the market is cleared based on generation cost minimization, without considering network constraints. Market clearing formulation for the second stage is developed considering congestion and generation costs, in which FACTS device (Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor) and DR programs (Direct Load Control besides Time-Of-Use) are optimally coordinated with GR in the presence of network constrains, to manage the congestion at minimum costs. In addition, to make conditions more realistic, the operational conditions spanning for a year (four seasons, day by day) are considered in this study. Finally, the paper prioritizes utilizing these approaches for different contingencies. The proposed formulation is verified on IEEE 14-bus and IEEE 30-bus test systems with supporting numerical and graphical results. Results show that applying GR with DR programs is the prioritized strategy in relieving congestion and reducing generation costs in the outage of the most sensitive lines contingency.

[1]  Mirko Todorovski,et al.  Reduction of PTDF matrix and its application in DC optimal power flow , 2015 .

[2]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Interval optimization based operating strategy for gas-electricity integrated energy systems considering demand response and wind uncertainty , 2016 .

[3]  G. Gutierrez-Alcaraz,et al.  Effects of demand response programs on distribution system operation , 2016 .

[4]  R. Goldoost-Soloot,et al.  Locating and Sizing of Series FACTS Devices Using Line Outage Sensitivity Factors and Harmony Search Algorithm , 2012 .

[5]  Peter Cappers,et al.  An assessment of market and policy barriers for demand response providing ancillary services in U.S. electricity markets , 2013 .

[6]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs , 2010 .

[7]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Congestion management coordination in the deregulated power market , 2003 .

[8]  Saad Mekhilef,et al.  Enhancing power transfer capability through flexible AC transmission system devices: a review , 2015, Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering.

[9]  Mehdi Rahmani-andebili,et al.  Modeling nonlinear incentive-based and price-based demand response programs and implementing on real power markets , 2016 .

[10]  M V Suganyadevi,et al.  Congestion Management in Deregulated Power System by Locating Series FACTS Devices , 2011 .

[11]  Hamed Hashemi-Dezaki,et al.  A new method based on sensitivity analysis to optimize the placement of SSSCs , 2013 .

[12]  Farrokh Aminifar,et al.  Optimal distributed static series compensator placement for enhancing power system loadability and reliability , 2015 .

[13]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Loadability enhancement with FACTS devices using gravitational search algorithm , 2016 .

[14]  Othman Hasnaoui,et al.  Dynamic performance improvement of wind farms equipped with three SCIG generators using STATCOM , 2014 .

[15]  Mahdi Zarei,et al.  Determining potential stability enhancements of flexible AC transmission system devices using corrected transient energy function , 2016 .

[16]  N. Yorino,et al.  FACTS Devices Allocation With Control Coordination Considering Congestion Relief and Voltage Stability , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Ajoy Kumar Chakraborty,et al.  Placement of UPFC for minimizing active power loss and total cost function by PSO algorithm , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Advanced Electronic Systems (ICAES).

[18]  Gabriela Glanzmann FACTS: flexible alternating current transmission systems , 2005 .

[19]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Demand response and smart grids—A survey , 2014 .

[20]  Mehrdad Ghandhari,et al.  Load curtailment minimization by optimal placement of Unified Power Flow Controller , 2016 .

[21]  Jianguo Yao,et al.  Multi-Objective Demand Response Model Considering the Probabilistic Characteristic of Price Elastic Load , 2016 .

[22]  Parimal Acharjee,et al.  Optimal power flow with UPFC using security constrained self-adaptive differential evolutionary algorithm for restructured power system , 2016 .

[23]  D. P. Kothari,et al.  Congestion management in power systems – A review , 2015 .

[24]  Scott Backhaus,et al.  Efficient algorithm for locating and sizing series compensation devices in large power transmission grids: II. Solutions and applications , 2014 .

[25]  J. Aghaei,et al.  Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: A review , 2013 .

[26]  Murat Fahrioglu Effect of demand management on regulated and deregulated electricity sectors , 2016 .

[27]  Jiming Chen,et al.  A Survey on Demand Response in Smart Grids: Mathematical Models and Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[28]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid in a Large Population Regime , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[29]  Mohammad Moradi,et al.  An Analytical Literature Review of the Available Techniques for Relieving Transmission Line Bottleneck in Deregulated Power Systems , 2016 .

[30]  Ahad Kazemi,et al.  Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming for Volt/Var Control in Distribution Systems With Renewable Energy Sources , 2016 .

[31]  Mohd Wazir Mustafa,et al.  Optimal real time cost-benefit based demand response with intermittent resources , 2015 .