Intelligent geospatial maritime risk analytics using the Discrete Global Grid System

Each year, accidents involving ships result in significant loss of life, environmental pollution and economic losses. The promotion of navigation safety through risk reduction requires methods to assess the spatial distribution of the relative likelihood of occurrence. Yet, such methods necessitate the integration of large volumes of heterogenous datasets which are not well suited to traditional data structures. This paper proposes the use of the Discrete Global Grid System (DGGS) as an efficient and advantageous structure to integrate vessel traffic, metocean, bathymetric, infrastructure and other relevant maritime datasets to predict the occurrence of ship groundings. Massive and heterogenous datasets are well suited for machine learning algorithms and this paper develops a spatial maritime risk model based on a DGGS utilising such an approach. A Random Forest algorithm is developed to predict the frequency and spatial distribution of groundings while achieving an R2 of 0.55 and a mean squared error of 0.002. The resulting risk maps are useful for decision-makers in planning the allocation of mitigation measures, targeted to regions with the highest risk. Further work is identified to expand the applications and insights which could be achieved through establishing a DGGS as a global maritime spatial data structure.

[1]  K. Sahr,et al.  Geodesic Discrete Global Grid Systems , 2003 .

[2]  R G Gibb,et al.  The rHEALPix Discrete Global Grid System , 2016 .

[3]  Ming-Cheng Tsou Big data analytics of safety assessment for a port of entry: A case study in Keelung Harbor , 2019 .

[4]  Anita Graser,et al.  The M³ massive movement model: a distributed incrementally updatable solution for big movement data exploration , 2020, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Majid Hojati,et al.  An integrated environmental analytics system (IDEAS) based on a DGGS , 2020 .

[6]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Assessing Grounding Frequency using Ship Traffic and Waterway Complexity , 2014, Journal of Navigation.

[7]  Rolf J. Bye,et al.  Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: An exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Ioannis Kontopoulos,et al.  A distributed framework for extracting maritime traffic patterns , 2020, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Kevin X. Li,et al.  How big data enriches maritime research – a critical review of Automatic Identification System (AIS) data applications , 2019, Transport Reviews.

[10]  Mario P. Brito,et al.  A critique of the use of domain analysis for spatial collision risk assessment , 2020 .

[11]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Towards an evidence-based probabilistic risk model for ship-grounding accidents , 2016 .

[12]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Big maritime data for the Baltic Sea with a focus on the winter navigation system , 2019, Marine Policy.

[13]  T. Fwa,et al.  Big AIS data based spatial-temporal analyses of ship traffic in Singapore port waters , 2017, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[14]  A. Harati-Mokhtari,et al.  Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data Reliability and Human Error Implications , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[15]  Ronald Pelot,et al.  Past, present, and future of the satellite-based automatic identification system: areas of applications (2004–2016) , 2018, WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs.

[16]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Reimagining the history of GIS , 2018, Ann. GIS.

[17]  Colin P.D. Birch,et al.  Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology , 2007 .

[18]  Winnie Daamen,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of vessel traffic for port assessment: A case study of the Port of Rotterdam , 2019 .

[19]  Jaeyoung Cho,et al.  Models and computational algorithms for maritime risk analysis: a review , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[20]  D. Watling,et al.  Big data and understanding change in the context of planning transport systems , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[21]  Marios Vodas,et al.  A distributed lightning fast maritime anomaly detection service , 2019, OCEANS 2019 - Marseille.

[22]  Martin Hassel,et al.  Underreporting of maritime accidents to vessel accident databases. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Analyses and Implications of Accidents in Singapore Strait , 2012 .

[24]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Optimal Zoning Systems for Spatial Interaction Models , 1977 .

[25]  Long Tran-Thanh,et al.  A machine learning approach for monitoring ship safety in extreme weather events , 2021 .

[26]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Correlation between the Ship Grounding Accident and the Ship Traffic - A Case Study Based on the Statistics of the Gulf of Finland , 2013 .

[27]  Ibrahim Y. Abualhaol,et al.  Mining Port Congestion Indicators from Big AIS Data , 2018, 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[28]  Richard Barnes Optimal orientations of discrete global grids and the Poles of Inaccessibility , 2020, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[29]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Bayesian networks for maritime traffic accident prevention: benefits and challenges. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Aldo Napoli,et al.  Uses and Misuses of the Automatic Identification System , 2019, OCEANS 2019 - Marseille.

[31]  F. Khan,et al.  Marine transportation risk assessment using Bayesian Network: Application to Arctic waters , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[32]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[33]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  A survey on addressing high-class imbalance in big data , 2018, Journal of Big Data.

[34]  Zoheir A. Sabeur,et al.  Datacubes: A Discrete Global Grid Systems Perspective , 2019, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[35]  Zhiwei Xu,et al.  Mapping Global Shipping Density from AIS Data , 2016, Journal of Navigation.

[36]  Sarah E. Battersby,et al.  Shapes on a plane: evaluating the impact of projection distortion on spatial binning , 2017 .