Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters

Abstract A multiattribute decision problem with imprecise parameters refers to one in which at least one of the parameters such as attribute weights and value scores is not represented by precise numerical values. Some well-known types of incomplete attribute weights are chosen and analyzed to find their extreme points. In doing so, we show that their coefficients matrix, by itself or by the change of variables, belongs to a class of M-matrix which enables us to find its extreme points readily due to the inverse-positive property. The knowledge of extreme points not only helps us to prioritize alternatives but also supports iterative exploration of decision-maker’s preference by investigating modified extreme points caused by additional preference information. A wide range of eligible attribute weights, however, often fail to result in the best alternative or a complete ranking of alternatives. To address this situation, we consider an approximate weighting method, so called the minimizing squared deviations from extreme points (MSD) which locates the attribute weights at the barycenter of a weight set. Accordingly, the MSD approach extends the rank order centroid (ROC) weighting method which is known to outperform other approximate weighting methods in case of ranked attribute weights. The evidence of the MSD’s superiority over a linear program-based weighting method is verified via simulation analysis under different forms of incomplete attribute weights.

[1]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  Establishing dominance between strategies with interval judgments of state probabilities , 2014 .

[2]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  Extreme point-based multi-attribute decision analysis with incomplete information , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  C. Kirkwood,et al.  The Effectiveness of Partial Information about Attribute Weights for Ranking Alternatives in Multiattribute Decision Making , 1993 .

[4]  L. Devroye.  Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation , 1986 .

[5]  D. A. Seaver,et al.  A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making , 1981 .

[6]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Preference simulation and preference programming: robustness issues in priority derivation , 1993 .

[7]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study , 1998 .

[8]  David Hawkins,et al.  Some Conditions of Macroeconomic Stability , 1948 .

[9]  F. Fernández,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis with partial information about the weighting coefficients , 1995 .

[10]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  A multiple-criteria composite index model for quantitative and qualitative data , 1994 .

[11]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Establishing Dominance in Multiattribute Decision Making Using an Ordered Metric Method , 1993 .

[12]  Ami Arbel,et al.  Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation , 1989 .

[13]  A. Mateos,et al.  Dominance intensity measure within fuzzy weight oriented MAUT: An application , 2013 .

[14]  David L. Olson,et al.  Implementation of the centroid method of Solymosi and Dombi , 1992 .

[15]  Jean H. P. Paelinck,et al.  Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development , 1976 .

[16]  Paul A. Anderson,et al.  Decision Making by Objection and the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1983 .

[17]  J. Dombi,et al.  A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights , 1986 .

[18]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Interactive decision aiding for group decision support , 1995 .

[19]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process with interval preference statements , 2017 .

[20]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Partial Information, Dominance, and Potential Optimality in Multiattribute Utility Theory , 1986, Oper. Res..

[21]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  ELICITATION OF SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF DECISION-MAKING * , 1978 .

[22]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements , 1992, Oper. Res..

[23]  F. H. Barron,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1994 .

[24]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Note: Some Conditions of Macroeconomic Stability , 1949 .

[25]  Robert J. Plemmons,et al.  Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences , 1979, Classics in Applied Mathematics.

[26]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[27]  Justo Puerto,et al.  Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple criteria decision processes , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Martin Weber.  A Method of Multiattribute Decision Making with Incomplete Information , 1985 .

[29]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Simple procedures of choice in multicriteria problems without precise information about the alternatives' values , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Martin Weber.  Decision Making with Incomplete Information , 1987 .

[31]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[32]  Bruce E. Barrett,et al.  Decision quality using ranked attribute weights , 1996 .

[33]  David L. Olson,et al.  Ordinal judgments in multiattribute decision analysis , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  A. M. Mármol,et al.  The use of partial information on weights in multicriteria decision problems , 1998 .

[35]  H. Moskowitz,et al.  Multiple-criteria robust interactive decision analysis (MCRID) for optimizing public policies , 1992 .

[36]  R. L. Winkler,et al.  Statistics : Probability, Inference and Decision , 1975 .

[37]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application , 1985, Oper. Res..

[38]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[39]  Alan Jessop,et al.  IMP: A decision aid for multiattribute evaluation using imprecise weight estimates , 2014 .

[40]  Z. Kmietowicz,et al.  Decision theory, linear partial information and statistical dominance , 1984 .

[41]  Behnam Malakooti,et al.  Ranking and screening multiple criteria alternatives with partial information and use of ordinal and cardinal strength of preferences , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[42]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Decision Making with Linear Partial Information (L.P.I.) , 1984 .

[43]  David L. Olson,et al.  Comparison of centroid and simulation approaches for selection sensitivity analysis , 1999 .

[44]  Charles P. Schmidt,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Additive Multiattribute Value Models , 1988, Oper. Res..

[45]  W. Cook,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data , 1991 .

[46]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.