Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36.

[1]  Leonard A. Marascuilo,et al.  STATISTICAL PROCEDURES FOR IDENTIFYING POSSIBLE SOURCES OF ITEM BIAS BASED ON x2 STATISTICS , 1981 .

[2]  Fritz Drasgow,et al.  Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations. , 1982 .

[3]  Steven J. Osterlind,et al.  Test item bias , 1983 .

[4]  A. Agresti Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data , 1985 .

[5]  Dorothy T. Thayer,et al.  Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. , 1986 .

[6]  Gregory L. Candell,et al.  Cross-Language and Cross-Cultural Comparisons in Scale Translations , 1986 .

[7]  I. Wiklund,et al.  Cross-cultural variation in the weighting of health statements: A comparison of English and Swedish valuations , 1987 .

[8]  Svend Kreiner,et al.  Analysis of Multidimensional Contingency Tables by Exact Conditional Tests: Techniques and Strategies , 1987 .

[9]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[10]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 Health Survey. , 1990 .

[11]  B. B. Ellis Assessing intelligence cross-nationally : a case for differential item functioning detection , 1990 .

[12]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Performance of a Five-Item Mental Health Screening Test , 1991, Medical care.

[13]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Fundamentals of Item Response Theory , 1991 .

[14]  Ingela Wiklund,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures , 1991 .

[15]  D. Osoba Effect of Cancer On Quality of Life , 1991 .

[16]  H. Kimmel,et al.  Identification of unique cultural response patterns by means of item response theory. , 1992 .

[17]  Michael J. Zieky,et al.  Practical questions in the use of DIF statistics in test development. , 1993 .

[18]  W. H. Angoff,et al.  Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. , 1993 .

[19]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  H. Thorsen,et al.  The Danish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: its adaptation and reliability. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[21]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  S. Hunt Cross-Cultural Comparability of Quality of Life Measures , 1993 .

[23]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  Barbara Gandek,et al.  The SF-36 Health Survey: Development and use in mental-health research and the IQOLA project , 1994 .

[25]  H. Wainer,et al.  Differential Item Functioning. , 1994 .

[26]  L. Shepard,et al.  Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items , 1994 .

[27]  C. McHorney,et al.  Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National Survey , 1994, Medical care.

[28]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[29]  J B Bjorner,et al.  Test for item bias in a quality of life questionnaire. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  I. W. Molenaar,et al.  Rasch models: foundations, recent developments and applications , 1995 .

[31]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[32]  P. Era,et al.  Item bias in self-reported functional ability among 75-year-old men and women in three Nordic localities , 1996, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[33]  M Sullivan,et al.  The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  M Sullivan,et al.  Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[35]  J B Bjorner,et al.  Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  Anastasia E. Raczek,et al.  Comparison of Rasch and summated rating scales constructed from SF-36 physical functioning items in seven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  P M Bentler,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[38]  T S Kristensen,et al.  The Danish SF-36 Health Survey: translation and preliminary validity studies. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.