A Model-Free Affective Reinforcement Learning Approach to Personalization of an Autonomous Social Robot Companion for Early Literacy Education

Personalized education technologies capable of delivering adaptive interventions could play an important role in addressing the needs of diverse young learners at a critical time of school readiness. We present an innovative personalized social robot learning companion system that utilizes children’s verbal and nonverbal affective cues to modulate their engagement and maximize their long-term learning gains. We propose an affective reinforcement learning approach to train a personalized policy for each student during an educational activity where a child and a robot tell stories to each other. Using the personalized policy, the robot selects stories that are optimized for each child’s engagement and linguistic skill progression. We recruited 67 bilingual and English language learners between the ages of 4–6 years old to participate in a between-subjects study to evaluate our system. Over a three-month deployment in schools, a unique storytelling policy was trained to deliver a personalized story curriculum for each child in the Personalized group. We compared their engagement and learning outcomes to a Non-personalized group with a fixed curriculum robot, and a baseline group that had no robot intervention. In the Personalization condition, our results show that the affective policy successfully personalized to each child to boost their engagement and outcomes with respect to learning and retaining more target words as well as using more target syntax structures as compared to children in the other groups.

[1]  Michel C. Desmarais,et al.  A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments , 2012, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[2]  S. Dehaene Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read , 2009 .

[3]  Julia A. Leonard,et al.  Language Exposure Relates to Structural Neural Connectivity in Childhood , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Agata Rozga,et al.  Using electrodermal activity to recognize ease of engagement in children during social interactions , 2014, UbiComp.

[5]  J. Chall,et al.  Readability revisited : the new Dale-Chall readability formula , 1995 .

[6]  Margaret Fish,et al.  Language skills in low-SES rural Appalachian children: normative development and individual differences, infancy to preschool , 2003 .

[7]  Mirko Gelsomini,et al.  Backchannel opportunity prediction for social robot listeners , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[8]  H. Scarborough Index of Productive Syntax , 1990, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[9]  Daniel McDuff,et al.  AFFDEX SDK: A Cross-Platform Real-Time Multi-Face Expression Recognition Toolkit , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Grace Kena,et al.  The Condition of Education 2015. NCES 2015-144. , 2015 .

[11]  Emily J. Ashurst,et al.  Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: Personalisation promotes child learning , 2017, PloS one.

[12]  M. Wolf Tales of Literacy for the 21st Century , 2016 .

[13]  Yaser Sheikh,et al.  OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-learning , 2008 .

[15]  S. Suter Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[16]  Ayanna M. Howard,et al.  Using a shared tablet workspace for interactive demonstrations during human-robot learning scenarios , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[17]  Veda Jairrels Giving Our Children a Fighting Chance: Poverty, Literacy, and the Development of Information Capital , 2018 .

[18]  P. Hadley,et al.  Language Sampling Protocols for Eliciting Text-Level Discourse. , 1998, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[19]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Q-learning , 1992, Machine Learning.

[20]  C. D. Lee,et al.  DIALOGIC INQUIRY IN EDUCATION : BUILDING ON THE LEGACY OF VYGOTSKY , 2006 .

[21]  Molly Fuller Collins,et al.  ELL preschoolers’ English vocabulary acquisition from storybook reading. , 2010 .

[22]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[23]  Patton O. Tabors,et al.  Is Literacy Enough?: Pathways to Academic Success for Adolescents , 2007 .

[24]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[25]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Growing Growth Mindset with a Social Robot Peer , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[26]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  The Theoretical Basis For Relationships Between Language and Literacy in Development , 1991 .

[27]  Ayanna M. Howard,et al.  Retrieving experience: Interactive instance-based learning methods for building robot companions , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[28]  Mirko Gelsomini,et al.  Telling Stories to Robots: The Effect of Backchanneling on a Child's Storytelling * , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[29]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Reading socially: Transforming the in-home reading experience with a learning-companion robot , 2018, Science Robotics.

[30]  John H L Hansen,et al.  Mapping the Early Language Environment Using All-Day Recordings and Automated Analysis. , 2017, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[31]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Social robots for education: A review , 2018, Science Robotics.

[32]  Jacqueline Kory,et al.  Storytelling with robots : effects of robot language level on children's language learning , 2014 .

[33]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Individualized Bayesian Knowledge Tracing Models , 2013, AIED.

[34]  Patton O. Tabors,et al.  Dual language and literacy development of Spanish-speaking preschool children. , 2007, Journal of applied developmental psychology.

[35]  Salomi S. Asaridou,et al.  The pace of vocabulary growth during preschool predicts cortical structure at school age , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Personalizing Robot Tutors to Individuals’ Learning Differences , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).