A modification of the rigid finite element method and its application to the J-lay problem

This article presents the Rigid Finite Element Method (RFEM), which allows us to take into account the flexibility of a system. Beam-like structures are analyzed, in which large deformations occur. The RFEM has been developed many years ago and successfully applied to practical engineering problems. The main difference between this method and the classical Finite Element Method (FEM) is the element deformation during analysis. In RFEM, the finite elements generated in a discretization process are treated as nondeformable bodies, whilst in FEM the elements are deformable; in RFEM, flexible, mass-less elements with properly chosen coefficients are introduced. A modification of the stiffness coefficients used in RFEM is proposed and explained in the article. It is shown how these new coefficients applied in RFEM lead to the same energy of deformation as in the case when the system is discretized by the classical FEM. This means that the energy of deformation is identical to that obtained in FEM, which leads to identical deformations of the elements. It is of particular importance that the RFEM is a much simpler method, faster in calculations and easier to learn and interpret. Furthermore, the generation of the inertia and stiffness matrices is much faster than in FEM. Another advantage is relatively easy implementation for multicore processor architecture. The calculation examples investigated cover some practical problems related to the offshore pipe laying process. The J-lay method is simulated by the use of the author’s own computer model based on a modified RFEM. The model takes into account wave and sea current loads, hydrodynamic forces and material nonlinearity (plastic strains can develop during large deformation). The simulation results are compared with those obtained from the commercial package ANSYS.

[1]  Stanisław Wojciech,et al.  Nonlinear vibration of a simply supported, viscoelastic inextensible beam and comparison of four methods , 1990 .

[2]  J. Wittenburg,et al.  Dynamics of systems of rigid bodies , 1977 .

[3]  R. Verley,et al.  A Soil Resistance Model for Pipelines Placed on Sandy Soils , 1994 .

[4]  Nonlinear static stress analysis of submarine high pressure pipelines , 1997 .

[5]  R. Huston Multi-body dynamics including the effects of flexibility and compliance , 1981 .

[6]  Iwona Adamiec-Wójcik,et al.  Application of the rigid finite element method to modelling of free vibrations of a band saw frame , 2005 .

[7]  K. S. Varyani,et al.  An absolute coordinate formulation for three-dimensional flexible pipe analysis , 2006 .

[8]  Subrata K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Handbook of Offshore Engineering , 2005 .

[9]  R. Huston,et al.  Cable dynamics—a finite segment approach , 1976 .

[10]  H. Vogel,et al.  DYNAMICS OF FLEXIBLE HOSE RISER SYSTEMS , 1987 .

[11]  M W Braestrup,et al.  Design and Installation of Marine Pipelines , 2005 .

[12]  Edmund Wittbrodt,et al.  Application of rigid finite element method to dynamic analysis of spatial systems , 1995 .

[13]  Boyun Guo,et al.  CHAPTER 10 – Introduction to Flexible Pipelines , 2005 .

[14]  Stanisław Wojciech,et al.  Mathematical model of a pipelay spread. , 2007 .

[15]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Plastic hinge approach to vehicle crash simulation , 1983 .

[16]  Gui-Rong Liu,et al.  The Finite Element Method , 2007 .

[17]  Massimo Callegari,et al.  Simple analytical models for the J-lay problem , 2005 .

[18]  Andrew Palmer,et al.  Touchdown indentation of the seabed , 2008 .

[19]  Johannes Gerstmayr,et al.  Analysis of Thin Beams and Cables Using the Absolute Nodal Co-ordinate Formulation , 2006 .

[20]  Y. K. Cheung,et al.  Optimization of buoyancy of an articulated stinger on submerged pipelines laid with a barge , 1997 .

[21]  Sw Sjoerd Rienstra Analytical approximations for offshore pipelaying problems , 1987 .

[22]  I. Adamiec-Wójcik,et al.  Experimental and computational analysis of large amplitude vibrations of spatial viscoelastic beams , 1994 .

[23]  Stanisław Wojciech,et al.  Application of joint coordinates and homogeneous transformations to modeling of vehicle dynamics , 2008 .

[24]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Dynamics of Multibody Systems , 2020 .

[25]  Ilson P. Pasqualino,et al.  A nonlinear analysis of the buckle propagation problem in deepwater pipelines , 2001 .

[26]  J. R. Morison,et al.  The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles , 1950 .

[27]  Michael M. Bernitsas,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL NONLINEAR DYNAMICS OF PIPELAYING , 1990 .

[28]  E. Wittbrodt,et al.  Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems: Rigid Finite Element Method , 2006 .

[29]  Marek Szczotka,et al.  Pipe laying simulation with an active reel drive , 2010 .

[30]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments , 1997 .

[31]  Masataka Fujino,et al.  ON THE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI-COMPONENT MOORING LINES , 1982 .

[32]  I. Adamiec-Wójcik,et al.  Nonlinear vibrations of spatial viscoelastic beams , 1993 .

[33]  John David Connelly,et al.  The dynamics of flexible multibody systems: A finite segment approach , 1994 .

[34]  Ronald L. Huston,et al.  The dynamics of flexible multibody systems: A finite segment approach—II. Example problems , 1994 .