Extinction of visible and infrared beams by falling snow.

Classical optics holds that the extinction cross of particles should be equal to twice their geometric cross section, in the limit where the particles are much larger than the wavelength. It follows that the extinction coefficient of such large scatterers should be independent of wavelength. Snowflakes are much larger than the wavelengths of visible and infrared radiation, yet many investigators have found that the visible and infrared extinction coefficient of falling snow measured with transmissometers is wavelength dependent. This dependency is known to be a result of the scattering contribution to the transmissometer signal. Furthermore, many measurements in the visible and infrared show that extinction values measured simultaneously with two transmissometers are linearly related up to at least 12 km(-1). The slope depends on the wavelengths and optical characteristics of the transmissometers. We show that for small values of extinction, the observations can be explained by taking into account single-scattering contributions to transmissometer signals. For high values of extinction, a multiplescattering model gives good agreement with measurements.

[1]  S. Warren,et al.  Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave. , 1984, Applied optics.

[2]  M A Seagraves.  Visible and infrared extinction in falling snow. , 1986, Applied optics.

[3]  W. E. Knowles Middleton,et al.  The Effect of the Angular Aperture of a Telephotometer on the Telephotometry of Collimated and Non-Collimated Beams* , 1949 .

[4]  J. Hodkinson.  Light Scattering and Extinction by Irregular Particles Larger than the Wavelength , 1963 .

[5]  John F. Ebersole,et al.  Visible And Infrared Transmission Through Snow , 1981, Optics & Photonics.

[6]  J. Hodkinson,et al.  Computations of Light-Scattering and Extinction by Spheres According to Diffraction and Geometrical Optics, and Some Comparisons with the Mie Theory , 1963 .

[7]  O. Lillesæter.  Parallel-Beam Attenuation of Light, Particularly by Falling Snow , 1965 .

[8]  V. Zuev,et al.  Propagation of laser beams in scattering media. , 1969, Applied optics.

[9]  C F Bohren,et al.  Forward-scattering corrected extinction by nonspherical particles. , 1985, Applied optics.

[10]  J. Hansen,et al.  Intensity and Polarization for Single Scattering by Polydisperse Spheres: A Comparison of Ray Optics and Mie Theory , 1971 .

[11]  F. X. Kneizys,et al.  Atmospheric transmittance/radiance: Computer code LOWTRAN 5 , 1978 .

[12]  L. W. Winchester,et al.  Scattering Corrections To Extinction Coefficients Measured In Falling Snow , 1983 .

[13]  Craig F. Bohren,et al.  Colors of snow, frozen waterfalls, and icebergs , 1983 .

[14]  Soon K. Cho,et al.  Electromagnetic Scattering , 2012 .

[15]  R B Smith,et al.  Transmitted beam profiles, integrated backscatter, and rangeresolved backscatter in inhomogeneous laboratory water droplet clouds. , 1988, Applied optics.

[16]  D. L. Hutt,et al.  Multi-Wavelength Transmittance Through Falling Snow , 1989, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[17]  L R Bissonnette,et al.  Multiscattering model for propagation of narrow light beams in aerosol media. , 1988, Applied optics.

[18]  C F Bohren,et al.  Absorption by a sphere: a simple approximation. , 1983, Applied optics.

[19]  Harold W. O'Brien.  Visibility and Light Attenuation in Falling Snow. , 1970 .