The use of detectability indices as a means of automatic exposure control for a digital mammography system

This work examines the use of a detectability index to control an Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) system for an amorphous-Selenium digital mammography detector. The default AEC mode for the system was evaluated using homogeneous poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) plates of thickness 20, 40, 60 and 70 mm to find the tube potential and anode/filter settings selected by the system. Detectability index (d') using a non-prewhitened model observer with eye filter (NPWE) was calculated for these beam qualities as a function of air kerma at the detector. AEC settings were calculated that gave constant d' as a function of beam quality for a homogeneous background; a target d' was used that ensured the system passed the achievable image quality criterion for the 0.1 mm diameter disc in the European Guidelines. Threshold gold thickness was measured using the CDMAM test object as a function of beam quality for the AEC mode, which held pixel value (PV) constant, and for the constant d' mode. Threshold gold thickness for the 0.1 mm disc increased by a factor of 2.18 for the constant PV mode, while constant d' mode held threshold gold thickness constant to within 7% and signal-difference-to-noise-ratio (SdNR) constant to within 5%. The constant d' settings derived for homogeneous images were then applied to a phantom with a structured background. Threshold gold thickness for the 0.13 mm disc increased by a factor of 1.90 for the constant PV mode, while constant d' mode held threshold gold thickness constant within 38% for 0.13 mm disk.

[1]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  A novel platform to simplify human observer performance experiments in clinical reading environments , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[2]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  The effect of background structure on the detection of low contrast objects in mammography. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  R Klausz,et al.  Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  Serge Muller,et al.  Impact of Textured Background on Scoring of Simulated CDMAM Phantom , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[5]  F R Verdun,et al.  Using a NPWE model observer to assess suitable image quality for a digital mammography quality assurance programme. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[6]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[9]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors. , 2005, Medical physics.

[11]  D. H. Kelly Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  S. Evans Catalogue of Diagnostic X-Ray Spectra and Other Data , 1998 .

[13]  N W Marshall,et al.  A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  N W Marshall Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  P. Baldelli,et al.  A novel method for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) evaluation of digital mammography detectors , 2009, European Radiology.

[16]  N W Marshall An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Comparison of software and human observers in reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. , 2006, Medical physics.