Development of evaluation indexes for assistive robots based on ICF

With the aging population trends in developed countries, there is an increased expectation of the application of assistive robots. A variety of robots have been developed to address this challenge. Although there are many technical problems to be solved, the lack of objective evaluation indexes for evaluating the benefit to the users is one of the important problems to be addressed before the commercialization of the assistive robots can be realized. The ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) is a classification of the health components of functioning and disability, and is being utilized in medical, healthcare, and welfare fields. The ICF has a basic framework to evaluate healthcare and welfare equipment, including robots, and it will be the basis of the evaluation indexes for assistive robots. In this paper, we present the development of evaluation indexes, and provide the results of preliminary experiments which were conducted using iARM and RAPUDA robots performing a certain lifting task. The experiments illustrate the issues involved in the development of ICF-based indexes for assitive robots.

[1]  Ester Ferrari,et al.  Critical Factors Involved in Using Interactive Robots for Play Activities of Children with Disabilities , 2007 .

[2]  J. Bornman The World Health Organisation's terminology and classification: application to severe disability , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  H.J.A. Stuyt,et al.  Cost-savings and economic benefits due to the assistive robotic manipulator (ARM) , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[4]  Serenella Besio,et al.  Profiling Robot-Mediated Play for Children with Disabilities through ICF-CY: The Example of the European Project IROMEC , 2008, ICCHP.

[5]  Yoshifumi Nishida,et al.  A concept of needs-oriented design and evaluation of assistive robots based on ICF , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[6]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  “Does it work?” A framework to evaluate the effectiveness of a robotic toy for children with special needs , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[7]  Anne Birge James,et al.  Activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living , 2009 .

[8]  R. Coughlin,et al.  Does It Work , 1978 .

[9]  B. Robins,et al.  Scenarios of robot-assisted play for children with cognitive and physical disabilities. , 2012 .

[10]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Bio-inspired assistive robotics: Service dogs as a model for human-robot interaction and mobile manipulation , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[11]  Charles C. Kemp,et al.  A list of household objects for robotic retrieval prioritized by people with ALS , 2008, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.