Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes

We measured count rates and scatter fraction on the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in conventional 2D and 3D acquisition modes, and in a partial collimation mode between 2D and 3D. As part of the evaluation of using partial collimation, we estimated global count rates using a scanner model that combined computer simulations with an empirical live-time function. Our measurements followed the NEMA NU2 count rate and scatter-fraction protocol to obtain true, scattered and random coincidence events, from which noise equivalent count (NEC) rates were calculated. The effect of patient size was considered by using 27 cm and 35 cm diameter phantoms, in addition to the standard 20 cm diameter cylindrical count-rate phantom. Using the scanner model, we evaluated two partial collimation cases: removing half of the septa (2.5D) and removing two-thirds of the septa (2.7D). Based on predictions of the model, a 2.7D collimator was constructed. Count rates and scatter fractions were then measured in 2D, 2.7D and 3D. The scanner model predicted relative NEC variation with activity, as confirmed by measurements. The measured 2.7D NEC was equal or greater than 3D NEC for all activity levels in the 27 cm and 35 cm phantoms. In the 20 cm phantom, 3D NEC was somewhat higher ( approximately 15%) than 2.7D NEC at 100 MBq. For all higher activity concentrations, 2.7D NEC was greater and peaked 26% above the 3D peak NEC. The peak NEC in 2.7D mode occurred at approximately 425 MBq, and was 26-50% greater than the peak 3D NEC, depending on object size. NEC in 2D was considerably lower, except at relatively high activity concentrations. Partial collimation shows promise for improved noise equivalent count rates in clinical imaging without altering other detector parameters.

[1]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A quantitative approach to a weight-based scanning protocol for PET oncology imaging , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[2]  David Eidelberg,et al.  Quantitative Brain PET. Comparison of 2D and 3D Acquisitions on the GE Advance Scanner. , 1998, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[3]  R. Nutt,et al.  A Multicrystal Two Dimensional BGO Detector System for Positron Emission Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Performance evaluation of an integrated PET/CT scanner: Discovery STE , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Optimization of Noise Equivalent Count Rate Performance for a Partially Collimated PET Scanner by Varying the Number of Septa , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Tomoyuki Hasegawa,et al.  A Monte Carlo simulation study on coarse septa for scatter correction in 3-D PET , 2001 .

[8]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[9]  C. Stearns,et al.  Random coincidence estimation from single event rates on the Discovery ST PET/CT scanner , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[10]  J. Votaw,et al.  Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  R.E. Schmitz,et al.  Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  Hossain Baghaei,et al.  Septa design study for volumetric imaging in positron emission tomography , 2001 .

[13]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  E Tanaka,et al.  A 2D/3D hybrid PET scanner with rotating partial slice-septa and its quantitative procedures , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  D. Kadrmas,et al.  Survey of parallel slat collimator designs for hybrid PET imaging. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  M. E. Bellemann,et al.  Reduktion der Strahlenexposition bei PET-Untersuchungen durch Datenakquisition im 3D-Modus , 1999, Nuklearmedizin.

[22]  Richard L. Wahl,et al.  Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.