Studying the discourse on economic policies in India using mass media, social media, and the parliamentary question hour data

The parliament, media, and citizens, are key stakeholders in any democracy. We study their priorities pertaining to four economic policies in India - Demonetization, Aadhaar, GST, and Farmers' Protests - by examining the content of questions asked by politicians in the parliament, news articles published in the mass media, and data from social media. We find that the mass media covers stories about different constituencies (the poor, middle-class, corporates, etc.) but shows biases in terms of which constituencies it chooses to focus on for each policy. The parliament tends to focus on procedural aspects of the policies. We also find that the social media simply echoes the trends of whatever is emphasized more in the mass media, without much deviation in the attention placed by social media users on different issues. We further find out that instead of selecting issues of importance based on feedback from citizens, the parliamentarians mostly indulge in partisanship, and shape their questions based on party goals that change depending on whether their party is in power or not. Overall, we are able to use this analysis to comment on how representative and responsive the Indian democracy is to its citizens.

[1]  Pamela Oliver,et al.  How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The Pulse of News in Social Media: Forecasting Popularity , 2012, ICWSM.

[3]  Stephen D. Reese,et al.  Journalists as Gatekeepers , 2008, The Handbook of Journalism Studies.

[4]  B. Nyhan,et al.  Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign , 2018 .

[5]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models , 2007 .

[6]  J. Pal,et al.  Mediatized Populisms| Innuendo as Outreach: @narendramodi and the Use of Political Irony on Twitter , 2017 .

[7]  Wenhao Yu,et al.  Supplementary material , 2015 .

[8]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[9]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Cashing out: digital payments and resilience post-demonetization , 2019, ICTD.

[10]  Stefanie Bailer,et al.  People's Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reasons for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament , 2011 .

[11]  L. Diamond,et al.  Liberation technology 1 , 2015 .

[12]  Patrick Ball,et al.  EXPLORING THE IMPLICATIONS OF SOURCE SELECTION IN THE CASE OF GUATEMALAN STATE TERROR, 1977-1995 , 2002 .

[13]  Pablo Barberá,et al.  The New Public Address System: Why Do World Leaders Adopt Social Media? , 2018 .

[14]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Political Ideology Detection Using Recursive Neural Networks , 2014, ACL.

[15]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Twitter and the rebranding of Narendra Modi , 2016 .

[16]  Michael Röder,et al.  Exploring the Space of Topic Coherence Measures , 2015, WSDM.

[17]  Viet-An Nguyen,et al.  Lexical and Hierarchical Topic Regression , 2013, NIPS.

[18]  Walter Quattrociocchi,et al.  Echo Chambers on Facebook , 2016 .

[19]  Jean Drèze,et al.  Aadhaar and Food Security in Jharkhand Pain without Gain ? , 2017 .

[20]  Carole Spary,et al.  Disrupting Rituals of Debate in the Indian Parliament , 2010 .

[21]  Kenneth E. Shirley,et al.  LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics , 2014 .

[22]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Legitimacy, Support and Endorsement: Narendra Modi’s Social Media Engagement with Celebrities , 2020 .

[23]  Özgür Ulusoy,et al.  Towards detecting media bias by utilizing user comments , 2016, WebSci.

[24]  Arindam Das-Gupta Some Problems With the Indian Goods and Services Tax , 2018 .

[25]  Suraj Jacob,et al.  Question Hour Activity and Party Behaviour in India , 2015 .

[26]  Thomas Saalfeld,et al.  Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10 , 2011, The Impact of Legislatures.

[27]  Jan-Egbert Sturm Political Economy Aspects of Income (Re-) Distribution , 2017 .

[28]  C. T. Salmon Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media , 1989 .

[29]  Sean Gerrish,et al.  Predicting Legislative Roll Calls from Text , 2011, ICML.

[30]  Kelly Blidook,et al.  Constituency Influence on ‘Constituency Members’: The Adaptability of Roles to Electoral Realities in the Canadian Case , 2011 .

[31]  Karen Bird,et al.  Gendering Parliamentary Questions , 2005 .

[32]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[33]  Noah A. Smith,et al.  Measuring Ideological Proportions in Political Speeches , 2013, EMNLP.

[34]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Speaking their Mind: Populist Style and Antagonistic Messaging in the Tweets of Donald Trump, Narendra Modi, Nigel Farage, and Geert Wilders , 2018, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).