The diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer diagnosis: a review.

[1]  G. Guazzoni,et al.  Diagnostic performance of microUltrasound at MRI‐guided confirmatory biopsy in patients under active surveillance for low‐risk prostate cancer , 2023, The Prostate.

[2]  S. Ghai,et al.  Micro-Ultrasound: Current Role in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Future Possibilities , 2023, Cancers.

[3]  X. Cathelineau,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of micro-ultrasound guided biopsies in patients with suspected prostate cancer , 2023, Central European journal of urology.

[4]  M. Menon,et al.  Side-specific, Microultrasound-based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer , 2022, European urology open science.

[5]  G. Guazzoni,et al.  Assessing the Role of High-resolution Microultrasound Among Naïve Patients with Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Persistently High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer , 2022, European urology open science.

[6]  M. Emberton,et al.  Prostatic high-resolution micro-ultrasound: an attractive step-forward in the management of prostate cancer patients , 2022, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[7]  M. Eklund,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Standard Biopsy Based on the STHLM3-MRI Study , 2022, JAMA oncology.

[8]  F. Crocetto,et al.  Micro-Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate and Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review , 2022, Medicina.

[9]  A. Kinnaird,et al.  Micro-ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance , 2022, European Urology Open Science.

[10]  F. Forsberg,et al.  The evolving role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in urology: a review , 2022, World Journal of Urology.

[11]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Comparison of Micro-US and Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-Naive Men. , 2022, Radiology.

[12]  F. Regis,et al.  Use of high-resolution micro-ultrasound to predict extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer prior to surgery: a prospective single-institutional study , 2022, World Journal of Urology.

[13]  N. Salem,et al.  Comparison Between Micro-Ultrasound and Multiparametric MRI Regarding the Correct Identification of Prostate Cancer Lesions. , 2022, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[14]  T. Schlomm,et al.  A non‐inferiority comparative analysis of micro‐ultrasonography and MRI‐targeted biopsy in men at risk of prostate cancer , 2021, BJU international.

[15]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Optimization of prostate biopsy - Micro-Ultrasound versus MRI (OPTIMUM): A 3-arm randomized controlled trial evaluating the role of 29 MHz micro-ultrasound in guiding prostate biopsy in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. , 2021, Contemporary clinical trials.

[16]  Lei Peng,et al.  The Micro-ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2021, Journal of endourology.

[17]  G. Guazzoni,et al.  The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis. , 2021, Urologic oncology.

[18]  C. Pavlovich,et al.  New imaging modalities to consider for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance , 2021, World Journal of Urology.

[19]  C. Earle,et al.  Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[20]  A. Stenzl,et al.  Micro-Ultrasound: a way to bring imaging for prostate cancer back to urology , 2021, Prostate international.

[21]  A. Toi,et al.  A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy , 2020, BJUI compass.

[22]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2020, European urology.

[23]  G. Guazzoni,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Microultrasound in Patients with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer at Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Single-institutional Prospective Study. , 2020, European urology focus.

[24]  E. Klein,et al.  Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A multicenter, prospective analysis. , 2020, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[25]  T. Schlomm,et al.  Evolution of Targeted Prostate Biopsy by Adding Microultrasound to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway. , 2020, European urology focus.

[26]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2020, European urology.

[27]  P. Camparo,et al.  MRI-directed high-frequency (29MhZ) TRUS-guided biopsies: initial results of a single-center study , 2020, European Radiology.

[28]  J. Correas,et al.  Advanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer , 2020, World Journal of Urology.

[29]  A. Rosenkrantz,et al.  Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. , 2020, European urology oncology.

[30]  Y. Takwoingi,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2019, European urology.

[31]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Structured Population-based Prostate-specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2019. , 2019, European urology.

[32]  Andrew Stephenson,et al.  Impact of using 29 MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound in real-time targeting of transrectal prostate biopsies: initial experience , 2019, World Journal of Urology.

[33]  Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa,et al.  Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. , 2019, European urology.

[34]  Brian Wodlinger,et al.  Comparison of conventional transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and micro-ultrasound for visualizing prostate cancer in an active surveillance population: A feasibility study. , 2018, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[35]  Brian Wodlinger,et al.  Assessing Cancer Risk on Novel 29 MHz Micro-Ultrasound Images of the Prostate: Creation of the Micro-Ultrasound Protocol for Prostate Risk Identification. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[36]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review , 2015, World Journal of Urology.

[37]  Toby C. Cornish,et al.  High-resolution transrectal ultrasound: pilot study of a novel technique for imaging clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2014, Urologic oncology.