Planform geometry, stacking pattern, and extrabasinal origin of low strength and intermediate strength cohesive debris flow deposits in the Marnoso-arenacea Formation, Italy

The Miocene Marnoso-arenacea Formation (Italy) is the only ancient sequence where deposits of individual submarine density flow deposits have been mapped in detail for long (>100 km) distances, thereby providing unique information on how such flows evolve. These beds were deposited by large and infrequent flows in a low-relief basin plain. An almost complete lack of bed amalgamation aids bed correlation, and resembles some modern abyssal plains, but contrasts with ubiquitous bed amalgamation seen in fan-lobe deposits worldwide. Despite the subdued topography of this basin plain, the beds have a complicated character. Previous work showed that a single flow can commonly comprise both turbidity current and cohesive mud-rich debris flows. The debris flows were highly mobile on low gradients, but their deposits are absent in outcrops nearest to source. Similar hybrid beds have been documented in numerous distal fan deposits worldwide, and they represent an important process for delivering sediment into the deep ocean. It is therefore important to understand their origin and flow dynamics. To account for the absence of debrites in proximal Marnoso-arenacea Formation outcrops, it was proposed that debris flows originated within the study area due to erosion of mud-rich seafloor; we show that this is incorrect. Clast and matrix composition show that sediment within the cohesive debris flows originated outside the study area. Previous work showed that intermediate and low strength debris flows produced different downflow-trending facies tracts. Here, we show that intermediate strength debris flows entered the study area as debris flows, while low strength (clast poor) debris flows most likely formed through local transformation from an initially turbulent mud-rich suspension. New field data document debrite planform shape across the basin plain. Predicting this shape is important for subsurface oil and gas reservoirs. Low strength and intermediate strength debrites have substantially different planform shapes. However, the shape of each type of debrite is consistent. Low strength debrites occur in two tongues at the margins of the outcrop area, while intermediate strength debrite forms a single tongue near the basin center. Intermediate strength debrites are underlain by a thin layer of structureless clean sandstone that may have settled out from the debris flow at a late stage, as seen in laboratory experiments, or been deposited by a forerunning turbidity current that is closely linked to the debris flow. Low strength debrites can infill relief created by underlying dune crests, suggesting gentle emplacement. Dewatering of basal clean sand did not cause a long runout of debris flows in this location. Hybrid beds are common in a much thicker stratigraphic interval than was studied previously, and the same two types of debrite occur there. Hybrid flows transported large volumes (as much as 10 km3 per flow) of sediment into this basin plain, over a prolonged period of time.

[1]  Esther J. Sumner,et al.  Subaqueous sediment density flows: Depositional processes and deposit types , 2012 .

[2]  J. Best,et al.  Depositional processes, bedform development and hybrid bed formation in rapidly decelerated cohesive (mud–sand) sediment flows , 2011 .

[3]  R. Tinterri,et al.  Stratigraphy and depositional setting of slurry and contained (reflected) beds in the Marnoso‐arenacea Formation (Langhian‐Serravallian) Northern Apennines, Italy , 2010 .

[4]  R. Wynn,et al.  How Did Thin Submarine Debris Flows Carry Boulder-Sized Intraclasts for Remarkable Distances Across Low Gradients to the Far Reaches of the Mississippi Fan? , 2010 .

[5]  P. Haughton,et al.  Hybrid sediment gravity flow deposits – Classification, origin and significance , 2009 .

[6]  D. Jennette,et al.  Geometry and architectural associations of co-genetic debrite–turbidite beds in basin-margin strata, Carboniferous Ross Sandstone (Ireland): Applications to reservoirs located on the margins of structurally confined submarine fans , 2009 .

[7]  A. Gardiner,et al.  Prediction of hydrocarbon recovery from turbidite sandstones with linked-debrite facies: Numerical flow-simulation studies , 2009 .

[8]  D. Hodgson Distribution and origin of hybrid beds in sand-rich submarine fans of the Tanqua depocentre, Karoo Basin, South Africa , 2009 .

[9]  C. Jackson,et al.  Sedimentology, stratigraphic occurrence and origin of linked debrites in the West Crocker Formation (Oligo-Miocene), Sabah, NW Borneo , 2009 .

[10]  E. Sumner,et al.  Deposits of flows transitional between turbidity current and debris flow , 2009 .

[11]  Jeff Peakall,et al.  A Phase Diagram for Turbulent, Transitional, and Laminar Clay Suspension Flows , 2009 .

[12]  R. Wynn,et al.  Provenance and pathways of late Quaternary turbidites in the deep-water Agadir Basin, northwest African margin , 2009 .

[13]  Makoto Ito Downfan Transformation from Turbidity Currents to Debris Flows at a Channel-to-Lobe Transitional Zone: The Lower Pleistocene Otadai Formation, Boso Peninsula, Japan , 2008 .

[14]  E. Sumner,et al.  Deposit Structure and Processes of Sand Deposition from Decelerating Sediment Suspensions , 2008 .

[15]  R. Schiebel,et al.  Onset of submarine debris flow deposition far from original giant landslide , 2007, Nature.

[16]  D. Piper,et al.  Submarine mass‐transport facies: new perspectives on flow processes from cores on the eastern North American margin , 2007 .

[17]  R. Wynn,et al.  New insight into the evolution of large‐volume turbidity currents: comparison of turbidite shape and previous modelling results , 2007 .

[18]  R. Wynn,et al.  Evolution of Turbidity Currents Deduced from Extensive Thin Turbidites: Marnoso Arenacea Formation (Miocene), Italian Apennines , 2007 .

[19]  P. Talling,et al.  Anatomy of turbidites and linked debrites based on long distance (120 × 30 km) bed correlation, Marnoso Arenacea Formation, Northern Apennines, Italy , 2006 .

[20]  R. Wynn,et al.  Bed geometry used to test recognition criteria of turbidites and (sandy) debrites , 2005 .

[21]  Z. Sylvester,et al.  Textural trends in turbidites and slurry beds from the Oligocene flysch of the East Carpathians, Romania , 2004 .

[22]  R. Wynn,et al.  Beds comprising debrite sandwiched within co‐genetic turbidite: origin and widespread occurrence in distal depositional environments , 2004 .

[23]  J. Dowdeswell,et al.  About this title , 2003, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[24]  P. Haughton,et al.  ‘Linked’ debrites in sand‐rich turbidite systems – origin and significance , 2003 .

[25]  R. Wynn,et al.  Turbidite depositional architecture across three interconnected deep‐water basins on the north‐west African margin , 2002 .

[26]  R. Wynn,et al.  Experimental constraints on shear mixing rates and processes: implications for the dilution of submarine debris flows , 2002, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[27]  Jeffrey G. Marr,et al.  Experiments on subaqueous sandy gravity flows: The role of clay and water content in flow dynamics and depositional structures , 2001 .

[28]  J. Laberg,et al.  Flow behaviour of the submarine glacigenic debris flows on the Bear Island Trough Mouth Fan, western Barents Sea , 2000 .

[29]  R. G. Rothwell,et al.  Influence of sea level and basin physiography on emplacement of the late Pleistocene Herodotus Basin Megaturbidite, SE Mediterranean Sea , 2000 .

[30]  Pierre Cochonat,et al.  The sequence of events around the epicentre of the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake: initiation of debris flows and turbidity current inferred from sidescan sonar , 1999 .

[31]  G. Shanmugam,et al.  Reinterpretation of Depositional Processes in a Classic Flysch Sequence (Pennsylvanian Jackfork Group), Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas and Oklahoma: Discussion , 1997 .

[32]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Geomorphic/Tectonic Control of Sediment Discharge to the Ocean: The Importance of Small Mountainous Rivers , 1992, The Journal of Geology.

[33]  D. B. Prior,et al.  Flow properties of turbidity currents in Bute Inlet, British Columbia , 1991 .

[34]  G. Zuffa,et al.  Petrology and Dispersal Pattern in the Marnoso-Arenacea Formation (Miocene, Northern Apennines) , 1983 .

[35]  D. Lowe Sediment Gravity Flows: II Depositional Models with Special Reference to the Deposits of High-Density Turbidity Currents , 1982 .

[36]  M. Leeder Sediment gravity flows , 1982 .

[37]  R. Hiscott,et al.  Fabric of Coarse Deep-water Sandstones Tourelle Formation, Quebec, Canada , 1980 .

[38]  F. Lucchi,et al.  Basin‐wide turbidites in a Miocene, over‐supplied deep‐sea plain: a geometrical analysis , 1980 .

[39]  R. Hiscott,et al.  Depositional Mechanics of Thick-Bedded Sandstones at the Base of A Submarine Slope, Tourelle Formation (Lower Ordovician), Quebec, Canada , 1979 .

[40]  Alec J. Smith,et al.  THE SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENTARY HISTORY OF THE ABERYSTWYTH GRITS (UPPER LLANDOVERIAN) , 1958, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London.