On the use of discrimination to assess memory

A number of studies have made use of sensory discrimination to assess memory. These experiments have typically employed a temporal two-alternative forced choice paradigm in which the interstimulus interval (ISI) is varied. Many of these tests have shown that ISI has little or no effect on discrimination performance. This has been taken as evidence for perfect or very good memory. An alternative interpretation would be that discrimination tests lack sufficient sensitivity to reveal memory effects. In the present study, computer simulations based on signal detection theory were used to estimate the relative effects of memory noise and direct noise (i.e., noise inherent in the discrimination task) on discrimination performance. These simulations indicate that the amount of memory noise has to be quite large to cause a marked elevation in discrimination thresholds and that sensory discrimination is a relatively insensitive test of memory.

[1]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  The effects of large orientation and spatial frequency differences on spatial discriminations , 1984, Vision Research.

[2]  S Magnussen,et al.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory , 1999, Psychological research.

[3]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[4]  S Magnussen,et al.  Visual Half-Field Symmetry in Orientation Perception , 1985, Perception.

[5]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single neurons and behavior. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  T. Mergner,et al.  Delayed pattern discrimination in patients with unilateral temporal lobe damage , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  S. H. Myhre,et al.  Representation of orientation and spatial frequency in perception and memory: a choice reaction-time analysis. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  D. P. Andrews.  Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea part I: Short lines , 1967 .

[9]  Patrick J. Bennett,et al.  Masking of spatial frequency in visual memory depends on distal, not retinal, frequency , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  Billy Lee,et al.  Contrast Transfer Characteristics of Visual Short-term Memory , 1996, Vision Research.

[11]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory , 1991, Vision Research.

[12]  T. M. Nelson,et al.  Delayed monochromatic hue matches indicate characteristics of visual memory. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Retention and disruption of motion information in visual short-term memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  D. Regan.  Storage of spatial-frequency information and spatial-frequency discrimination , 1985 .

[15]  Svem Magnussen,et al.  High-Fidelity Perceptual Long-Term Memory , 1994 .

[16]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[17]  R. Blake,et al.  Memory for visual motion. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Perfect visual short-term memory for periodic patterns , 1990 .

[19]  S. Magnussen.  Low-level memory processes in vision , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  G. Orban,et al.  Decision processes in visual discrimination of line orientation. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J P Thomas,et al.  Parallel processing in visual short-term memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  I. Reinvang,et al.  Electrophysiological localization of brain regions involved in perceptual memory , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  F. Campbell,et al.  Spatial-frequency discrimination in human vision. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.