Exploring Two Teacher Education Online Learning Designs

Abstract Online learning is rapidly becoming a permanent feature of higher education. In a preponderance of instances, online learning is designed using conventional educational practices: lecture, grades, group discussion, and the like. Concerns with traditional pedagogy instantiated by course management systems raise questions about the quality of learner’s online experiences. There is a need to reconsider the design of learning opportunities in light of emerging online delivery modes. This study compared learner perceptions of two online courses—one using the more traditional approach capitalizing on the affordances of Blackboard and one using the COPLS one-on-one model (Norton, 2003). Results revealed that both environments were perceived as providing a high quality learning experience. In addition, results point to the importance of self-regulation, the role of the instructor/facilitator/mentor, and the role of the group as factors influencing learners’ perception of the quality of their learning experience, positive aspects of their learning experience, and challenges that influenced their learning experience.

[1]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants' Experiences , 2003 .

[2]  L. Schauble,et al.  Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .

[3]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005. , 2005 .

[4]  R. Sternberg.  What Is an “Expert Student?” , 2003 .

[5]  G. Dunnington,et al.  The Art of Mentoring , 2004 .

[6]  Tina Blythe,et al.  The Teaching for Understanding Guide , 1997 .

[7]  Helen C. Barrett.  Strategic Questions: What To Consider When Planning for Electronic Portfolios. , 1998 .

[8]  Suzanne Young,et al.  Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education , 2006 .

[9]  Priscilla Norton.  COPLS: An Alternative to Traditional Online Course Management Tools , 2003 .

[10]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[11]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context , 2001 .

[12]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[13]  Michael Spangle,et al.  Approaching Value-Centered Education through the Eyes of an Electronic Generation: Strategies for Distance Learning , 2002 .

[14]  P. Norton.  Teaching With Technology , 1998 .

[15]  P. Benson,et al.  Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An enquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publications. , 2006 .

[16]  Brenda Bannan-Ritland,et al.  The Role of Design in Research: The Integrative Learning Design Framework , 2003 .

[17]  Wendi A. Maloney.  Brick and Mortar Campuses Go Online. , 1999 .

[18]  Lois J. Zachary,et al.  The Mentor's Guide: Facilitating Effective Learning Relationships , 2000 .

[19]  P. Northrup.  Online Learners' Preferences for Interaction , 2002 .

[20]  N. Hara.  STUDENT DISTRESS IN A WEB-BASED DISTANCE EDUCATION COURSE , 2000 .

[21]  Robin Williams.  The Non-Designer's Design Book, Second Edition , 2003 .

[22]  T. Banta.  Quality in Distance Education: Focus on On-Line Learning (review) , 2004 .

[23]  Allan Collins,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Education , 1992 .

[24]  Sharmila Pixy Ferris,et al.  Electronic courseware in higher education , 2005, First Monday.

[25]  Margaret Rangecroft,et al.  Evaluating Distance Education Courses: The student perception , 2001 .

[26]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Interaction in Post-Secondary Web-Based Learning , 1999 .

[27]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[28]  B. McCombs,et al.  A Learner-Centered Framework for E-Learning , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[29]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Online learning as information delivery: Digital myopia , 2004 .