E-dialogues: A role in interactive sustainable development?

Human societies worldwide are dealing with messy, wicked problems beyond the capacity of any one sector, community or nation to solve. In such complex, turbulent environments (Trist 1983) there is even a greater need for collaboration between sectors, communities, and countries to solve the dynamically interconnected problems human societies are now facing. The world must become committed to unprecedented interaction and sustained dialogue around these interconnected, and interdependent public policy issues, particularly sustainable development. Yet, the transaction costs of face-to-face meetings are high. Also, one has to question the sustainability of current modes of travel, particularly the air travel required to bring together stakeholders on a global scale. Synchronous on-line electronic dialogues (e-Dialogues) are an emerging way of transcending place and time constraints, with the capacity for sustained connectivity between communities worldwide and the more rapid dissemination of research and knowledge produced on the ground at the community level.

[1]  Tony H. Grubesic,et al.  Spatial dimensions of Internet activity , 2002 .

[2]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  Managing the Emergence of Clusters: An Increasing Returns Approach to Strategic Change , 2001 .

[3]  Ananda Mitra,et al.  From Cyber Space to Cybernetic Space: Rethinking the Relationship between Real and Virtual Spaces , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  The Structure of Founding Teams: Homophily, Strong Ties, and Isolation among U.S. Entrepreneurs , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[5]  S. Matei.  The Impact of State-Level Social Capital on the Emergence of Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[6]  Simone C. O. Conceição,et al.  Narrowing the Digital Divide in Low-Income, Urban Communities , 2004 .

[7]  J. Kiesner,et al.  Peer relations across contexts: individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. , 2003, Child development.

[8]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[10]  J. Woody Stanley,et al.  The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation , 2003, DG.O.

[11]  Felix Geyer,et al.  Virtual communities in cyberspace , 1996 .

[12]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[13]  R. Pilkington,et al.  Facilitating debate in networked learning: Reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education , 2003 .

[14]  Miranda Mowbray,et al.  Philosophically Based Limitations to Freedom of Speech in Virtual Communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[15]  K. Wright,et al.  Perceptions of on‐line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on‐line support groups , 2000 .

[16]  R. Putman.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community, NY: Simon and Shuster, 2000, 541 p. , 2002 .

[17]  Ananda Mitra,et al.  Marginal Voices in Cyberspace , 2001, New Media Soc..

[18]  N. Carter,et al.  The Structure of Founding Teams: Homophily, Strong Ties, and Isolation among U.S. Entrepreneurs , 2003 .

[19]  J. Onyx,et al.  Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities , 2000 .

[20]  Eric Trist,et al.  Referent Organizations and the Development of Inter-Organizational Domains , 1983 .

[21]  Noah Mark,et al.  Culture and Competition: Homophily and distancing Explanations for Cultural Niches , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[22]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  The comprehensive electronic town meeting and its role in 21st century democracy , 2001 .

[24]  R. Norgaard.  Development betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. , 1994 .