Electoral accountability and local government efficiency: quasi-experimental evidence from the Italian health care sector reforms

This paper evaluates the effect of two policy changes on the efficiency of Italian regional governments in the provision of health care services: first a change in the electoral system; second a process of fiscal decentralisation. The electoral system was changed in 1995 and replaced a pure proportional system by a majoritarian system, fostering the transition of regional governments towards a presidential regime. The process of fiscal decentralisation took effect in 1998, when intergovernmental grants earmarked for the health care sector were replaced by regional taxes. The Italian context offers a unique source of data to test the predictions of recent theoretical models that support a positive relationship between government efficiency and the electoral accountability enhanced by institutions such as electoral rules and fiscal decentralisation. The paper provides two main contributions: 1) a comprehensive analysis of the two main reforms that involved Italian regional governments and the health care sector during the 1990s; 2) the evaluation of the impact of the electoral reform in a quasi-experimental setting. The final results provide empirical evidence in line with the findings of the theoretical models.

[1]  D. Epple.  Searching for Leviathan : An Empirical Study , 1995 .

[2]  John M. Carey.  The Economic Effects of Constitutions , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[3]  Miguel St. Aubyn,et al.  Non-Parametric Approaches to Education and Health Efficiency in OECD Countries , 2005 .

[4]  C. Lovell,et al.  Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Frontmatter , 2000 .

[5]  M. Stewart.  The Impact of the Introduction of the UK Minimum Wage on the Employment Probabilities of Low Wage Workers , 2002 .

[6]  J. Vanneste,et al.  Explaining differences in productive efficiency: An application to Belgian municipalities , 1994 .

[7]  M. Delis,et al.  Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency: evidence from OECD countries , 2013, Economics of Governance.

[8]  Raymond J. Fisman,et al.  Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence Across Countries , 2000 .

[9]  Z. Or.  DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH OUTCOMES IN INDUSTRIALISED COUNTRIES: A POOLED, CROSS-COUNTRY, TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[10]  J. Tirole,et al.  Essential Facility Financing and Market Structure , 2001 .

[11]  Health systems: improving performance , 2000 .

[12]  G. Turati,et al.  Bailing out expectations and public health expenditure. , 2009, Journal of health economics.

[13]  C. Binns,et al.  Health for All , 2015, Asia-Pacific journal of public health.

[14]  G. Debreu.  The Coefficient of Resource Utilization , 1951 .

[15]  J. Faguet,et al.  Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs , 2004 .

[16]  I. Barankay,et al.  Decentralization and the Productive Efficiency of Government: Evidence from Swiss Cantons , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis:the mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis , 2008 .

[18]  B. Park,et al.  A NOTE ON THE CONVERGENCE OF NONPARAMETRIC DEA ESTIMATORS FOR PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY SCORES , 1998, Econometric Theory.

[19]  Antonio Afonso,et al.  Relative Efficiency of Health Provision: A DEA Approach with Non-Discretionary Inputs , 2006 .

[20]  M. Stewart.  The Impact of the Introduction of the U.K. Minimum Wage on the Employment Probabilities of Low-Wage Workers , 2004 .

[21]  Ben Lockwood,et al.  Decentralization and Electoral Accountability: Incentives, Separation and Voter Welfare , 2005 .

[22]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy , 2000 .

[23]  Ajay Tandon,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE EFFICIENCY OF NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMS IN PRODUCING HEALTH : AN ANALYSIS OF 191 COUNTRIES , 2000 .

[24]  P. Seabright.  Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model , 1996 .

[25]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[26]  J. Buchanan,et al.  The power to tax : analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution , 1981 .

[27]  A. Worthington,et al.  Incorporating contextual information in public sector efficiency analyses: a comparative study of NSW local government , 2002 .

[28]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[29]  Unto Häkkinen,et al.  Cross-Country Analysis of Efficiency in OECD Health Care Sectors: Options for Research , 2007 .

[30]  Jonathan Rodden,et al.  Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government , 2003, International Organization.

[31]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[32]  A. Worthington.  Performance Indicators and Efficiency Measurement in Public Libraries , 1999 .

[33]  Hans Bjurek,et al.  Efficiency, Productivity and Determinants of Inefficiency at Public Day Care Centers in Sweden , 1992 .

[34]  T. Besley,et al.  Fiscal Restraints and Voter Welfare , 2005 .

[35]  Leslie E. Papke,et al.  Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates , 2008 .

[36]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[37]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[38]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[39]  M. Keen,et al.  Decentralization and the Quality of Government , 2000 .

[40]  Federico Revelli,et al.  Yardstick competition in intergovernmental relationships: theory and empirical predictions , 2004 .

[41]  Donald F. Vitaliano,et al.  Assessing Public Library Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 1998 .

[42]  J. Faguet,et al.  Does Decentralization Increase Government Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia , 2002 .

[43]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[44]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Incumbent Behavior : Vote-Seeking , Tax-Setting , and Yardstick Competition , 2007 .

[45]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Stratified Models of Education Production Using Modified DEA and Regression Analysis , 1994 .

[46]  C. Timmer.  Using a Probabilistic Frontier Production Function to Measure Technical Efficiency , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[47]  Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms.  STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS OF , 2014 .