A Reductionist Approach to Creating and Using Neuromusculoskeletal Models

There are many possible approaches for developing models of physical systems. At one extreme exists the black-box model in which only the inputs and outputs of the system are considered important aspects of the model (see Chapter 9). Alternatively one can divide a system into separate components and model each component separately (see Chapter 8). The most obvious difference between these approaches is that there is more information in the latter model than just the inputs and outputs of the system. This latter approach is loosely termed reductionism—the form of the model for the system is ‘reduced’ into smaller components, each of which should have some testable relationship to a corresponding physical structure.

[1]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[2]  A. Huxley,et al.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  G. Cavagna Elastic bounce of the body. , 1970, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  C. M. Chanaud,et al.  Distribution and innervation of short, interdigitated muscle fibers in parallel‐fibered muscles of the cat hindlimb , 1987, Journal of morphology.

[7]  Huijing Pa,et al.  Length-force characteristics of aponeurosis in passive muscle and during isometric and slow dynamic contractions of rat gastrocnemius muscle. , 1988 .

[8]  F. Zajac,et al.  Determining Muscle's Force and Action in Multi‐Articular Movement , 1989, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[9]  G E Loeb,et al.  Understanding sensorimotor feedback through optimal control. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[10]  G. Loeb,et al.  Feedback gains for correcting small perturbations to standing posture , 1991 .

[11]  N. Hogan,et al.  Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? , 1992, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[12]  R. D'ambrosia,et al.  The isometric length-force models of nine different skeletal muscles. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  W. Pulsinelli,et al.  Antagonism of the NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in global versus focal brain ischemia. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[14]  Gerald E. Loeb,et al.  Architectural features of multiarticular muscles , 1994 .

[15]  G. Loeb,et al.  Mechanical properties of aponeurosis and tendon of the cat soleus muscle during whole‐muscle isometric contractions , 1995, Journal of morphology.

[16]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Organizing principles for voluntary movement: extending single-joint rules. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  T. Nichols,et al.  Mechanical actions of heterogenic reflexes among ankle stabilizers and their interactions with plantarflexors of the cat hindlimb. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  G. Loeb,et al.  Relationships between range of motion, Lo, and passive force in five strap‐like muscles of the feline hind limb , 1996, Journal of morphology.