Hydrodynamic regime determines the feeding success of larval fish through the modulation of strike kinematics

Larval fishes experience extreme mortality rates, with 99% of a cohort perishing within days after starting to actively feed. While recent evidence suggests that hydrodynamic factors contribute to constraining larval feeding during early ontogeny, feeding is a complex process that involves numerous interacting behavioural and biomechanical components. How these components change throughout ontogeny and how they contribute to feeding remain unclear. Using 339 observations of larval feeding attempts, we quantified the effects of morphological and behavioural traits on feeding success of Sparus aurata larvae during early ontogeny. Feeding success was determined using high-speed videography, under both natural and increased water viscosity treatments. Successful strikes were characterized by Reynolds numbers that were an order of magnitude higher than those of failed strikes. The pattern of increasing strike success with increasing age was driven by the ontogeny of traits that facilitate the transition to higher Reynolds numbers. Hence, the physical growth of a larva plays an important role in its transition to a hydrodynamic regime of higher Reynolds numbers, in which suction feeding is more effective.

[1]  Ulrike K Müller,et al.  Flow patterns of larval fish: undulatory swimming in the intermediate flow regime , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  E. Saiz,et al.  Planktivorous feeding in calm and turbulent environments, with emphasis on copepods , 1995 .

[3]  E. Houde Comparative Growth, Mortality, and Energetics of Marine Fish Larvae: Temperature and Implied Latitudinal Effects , 1989 .

[4]  Alex Liberzon,et al.  Automated detection of feeding strikes by larval fish using continuous high-speed digital video: a novel method to extract quantitative data from fast, sparse kinematic events , 2016, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  D. O'Malley,et al.  Locomotor repertoire of the larval zebrafish: swimming, turning and prey capture. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Brian R. MacKenzie,et al.  Encounter rates and swimming behavior of pause‐travel and cruise larval fish predators in calm and turbulent laboratory environments , 1995 .

[7]  M. Yúfera,et al.  The onset of exogenous feeding in marine fish larvae , 2007 .

[8]  Victor China,et al.  Hydrodynamic Constraints of Suction Feeding in Low Reynolds Numbers, and the Critical Period of Larval Fishes. , 2015, Integrative and comparative biology.

[9]  J. Osse,et al.  Dynamic morphology of fish larvae, structural implications of friction forces in swimming, feeding and ventilation , 1999 .

[10]  R. Holzman,et al.  An integrative modeling approach to elucidate suction-feeding performance , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  T. Hung Life in Moving Fluids—The physical biology of flow , 1988 .

[12]  P. Lenz,et al.  Predator-prey interactions in the plankton: larval fish feeding on evasive copepods , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Ulrike K. Müller,et al.  Inertia as a ‘safe harbour’: do fish larvae increase length growth to escape viscous drag? , 1996, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[14]  Steven W. Day,et al.  Timing is everything: coordination of strike kinematics affects the force exerted by suction feeding fish on attached prey , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  O. O. Oluwagbemi,et al.  Insights from computational modelling and simulation towardspromoting public health among African countries , 2013 .

[16]  Michael Hargather,et al.  Color gradient background-oriented schlieren imaging , 2015 .

[17]  R. Holzman,et al.  Suction feeding across fish life stages: flow dynamics from larvae to adults and implications for prey capture , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  E. Houde,et al.  Emerging from Hjort's Shadow , 2008 .

[19]  André W. Visser,et al.  Predation vulnerability of planktonic copepods: consequences of predator foraging strategies and prey sensory abilities , 1998 .

[20]  Timothy E Higham,et al.  Morphology, Kinematics, and Dynamics: The Mechanics of Suction Feeding in Fishes. , 2015, Integrative and comparative biology.

[21]  P. Aerts,et al.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  R. Cowen,et al.  Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. , 2009, Annual review of marine science.

[23]  J. M. Reinhart,et al.  The Feeding Behavior and Ecology of Marine Fish Larvae , 2004 .

[24]  J. Hjort,et al.  Fluctuations in the Great Fisheries of Northern Europe: Viewed in the Light of Biological Research , 1914 .

[25]  J. Hunter,et al.  Feeding Ecology and Predation of Marine Fish Larvae , 2013 .

[26]  E. Houde Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability , 1987 .

[27]  R. J. Shields Larviculture of marine finfish in Europe , 2001 .

[28]  G. Lauder,et al.  Challenging zebrafish escape responses by increasing water viscosity , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  M. Drost Relation between aiming and catch success in larval fishes , 1987 .

[30]  M. Lankheet,et al.  Acquired versus innate prey capturing skills in super-precocial live-bearing fish , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  J. Blaxter,et al.  Ninth Larval Fish Conference , 1986 .

[32]  Victor China,et al.  Hydrodynamic starvation in first-feeding larval fishes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  M. Drost,et al.  A quantitative hydrodynamical model of suction feeding in larval fishes: the role of frictional forces , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[34]  D. Pauly,et al.  Hatching time in spherical, pelagic, marine fish eggs in response to temperature and egg size , 1988, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[35]  J. Havenhand,et al.  Physiological acclimation to decreased water temperature and the relative importance of water viscosity in determining the feeding performance of larvae of a serpulid polychaete , 2005 .