Online adaptive compensation of the ARMin Rehabilitation Robot

Robot-assisted arm therapy is increasingly applied in neurorehabilitation. The reason for this development over the last decades was that robots relieve the therapist from hard physical work while the training intensity can be increased. Importantly, an increase in training intensity is closely linked to functional improvements of the patient. However, usability of the robot for therapists was hardly considered an important factor in rehabilitation robot development so far. We believe that usability of the robot is a key factor for acceptance of the device by therapists. In this paper, an online adaptive compensation for the ARMin rehabilitation robot is presented, which aims at improving usability of the robot. Therefore, we expect ARMin therapy to become even more effective than conventional therapy at a level that is also relevant for the patient. Additionally, improved usability relieves the therapist from unnecessary/time-consuming tasks linked to robot handling. For the ARMin, the new online adaptive compensation takes over automatic updates of changed upper and lower arm lengths as well as adaptation of shoulder angle settings to fit the patient's anthropometry. Simultaneously, the model-based compensation in ARMin is directly updated to account for hardware changes. Importantly, the online adaptive compensation provides improved performance of ARMin even at the borders of the workspace. In experiments, we could show that the adaptive online compensation relieves the force and position controller from additional burdens and increases the robot performance drastically especially at the workspace border.

[1]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[2]  S. Wood-Dauphinée,et al.  Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  R. Teasell,et al.  The Role of Task-Specific Training in Rehabilitation Therapies , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[4]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin III --arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation , 2009 .

[5]  Robert Riener,et al.  Estimating the patient's contribution during robot-assisted therapy. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[7]  J. Liepert,et al.  Training‐induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients , 2000, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[8]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  G. Nelles,et al.  Cortical reorganization--effects of intensive therapy. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[10]  Robert Riener,et al.  Online learning and adaptation of patient support during ADL training , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[11]  David Geer,et al.  Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. , 1991, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  R. Riener,et al.  Guidance in the nullspace reduces task difficulty in robot-assisted coordination training , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[13]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[16]  Hussein A. Abdullah,et al.  Design Issues for Therapeutic Robot Systems: Results from a Survey of Physiotherapists , 2005, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[17]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[18]  N. Hogan,et al.  Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[19]  Giulio Rosati,et al.  Planar Robotic Systems for Upper-Limb Post-Stroke Rehabilitation , 2008 .

[20]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  JNER: a forum to discuss how neuroscience and biomedical engineering are reshaping physical medicine & rehabilitation , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[22]  M.K. O'Malley,et al.  Design of a haptic arm exoskeleton for training and rehabilitation , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[23]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-Assisted Arm Assessments in Spinal Cord Injured Patients: A Consideration of Concept Study , 2015, PloS one.