Robot-assisted microsurgical forceps with haptic feedback for transoral laser microsurgery

In this paper, a novel, motorized, multi-degrees-of-freedom (DoF), microsurgical forceps tool is presented, which is based on a master-slave teleoperation architecture. The slave device is a 7-DoF manipulator with: (i) 6-DoF positioning and orientation, (ii) 1 open/close gripper DoF; and (iii) an integrated force/torque sensor for tissue grip-force measurement. The master device is a 7-DoF haptic interface which teleoperates the slave device, and provides haptic feedback in its gripper interface. The combination of the device and the surgeon interface replaces the manual, hand-held device providing easy-to-use and ergonomic tissue control, simplifying the surgical tasks. This makes the system suitable to real surgical scenarios in the operating room (OR). The performance of the system was analysed through the evaluation of teleoperation control and characterization of gripping force. The new system offers an overall positioning error of less than 400 μm demonstrating its safety and accuracy. Improved system precision, usability, and ergonomics point to the potential suitability of the device for the OR and its ability to advance haptic-feedback-enhanced transoral laser microsurgeries.

[1]  M. Schijven,et al.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Claudio Pacchierotti,et al.  Cutaneous haptic feedback to ensure the stability of robotic teleoperation systems , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A new ENT microsurgery robot: Error analysis and implementation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  David Kerr,et al.  A methodology for design and appraisal of surgical robotic systems , 2009, Robotica.

[5]  Manabu Nagasaka,et al.  Measurement of the Physical Properties during Laparoscopic Surgery Performed on Pigs by Using Forceps with Pressure Sensors , 2015, Advances in urology.

[6]  Shuxin Wang,et al.  Kinematic Design for Robot-assisted Laryngeal Surgery Systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Bilateral Telemanipulation With Time Delays: A Two-Layer Approach Combining Passivity and Transparency , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[8]  M. Hirano.  Morphological structure of the vocal cord as a vibrator and its variations. , 1974, Folia phoniatrica.

[9]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A dexterous system for laryngeal surgery , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[10]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery , 2004 .

[11]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Enhanced computer-assisted laser microsurgeries with a “virtual microscope” based surgical system , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[12]  Jaydev P. Desai,et al.  A Novel Approach to Robotic Cardiac Surgery Using Haptics and Vision , 2002 .

[13]  Thomas Maier,et al.  A new Micromanipulator System for middle ear surgery , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.