The Role of Within-Category Variability in Category-Based Induction: A Developmental Study

The present studies tested the hypothesis that strong assumptions about within-category homogeneity impede children's recognition of the inductive value of diverse samples of evidence. In Study 1a, children (7-year-olds) and adults were randomly assigned to receive a prime emphasizing within-category variability, a prime emphasizing within-category similarities, or to not receive a prime. Only following the variability prime, children demonstrated a reliable preference for evaluating diverse over nondiverse samples to determine whether there is support for a category-wide generalization. Adults demonstrated a robust preference for diverse samples in all conditions. These effects extended beyond the specific categories included in the prime, as well as to multiple types of test questions. Study 1b demonstrated that priming variability leads children to select diverse samples only when doing so is informative for induction. Implications for conceptual development are discussed.

[1]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Tree of Life: Universal and Cultural Features of Folkbiological Taxonomies and Inductions , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  S. Gelman,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Consideration of Sample Diversity in Inductive Reasoning , 2008 .

[3]  S. Gelman,et al.  Children's use of sample size and diversity information within basic-level categories. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  D. Medin,et al.  A relevance theory of induction , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  S. Carey.  Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[6]  Marjorie Rhodes,et al.  Sample diversity and premise typicality in inductive reasoning: Evidence for developmental change , 2008, Cognition.

[7]  E. Markman,et al.  Categories and induction in young children , 1986, Cognition.

[8]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Category-Based Induction , 1990 .

[9]  S. Gelman.  The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Charles W. Kalish,et al.  Categories and Causality , 1993 .

[11]  Barbara A. Shepperson,et al.  Test sample selection by preschool children: Honoring diversity , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[12]  S. Gelman,et al.  Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics. , 2003, Child development.

[13]  Marjorie Rhodes,et al.  Children's attention to sample composition in learning, teaching and discovery. , 2010, Developmental science.

[14]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The development of category-based induction. , 1992, Child development.

[15]  K. A. Heller,et al.  Gender stereotypes and social inferences: A developmental study. , 1986 .

[16]  S. Gelman,et al.  Categories influence predictions about individual consistency. , 2008, Child development.

[17]  S. Gelman,et al.  A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide , 2009, Cognition.

[19]  M. Taylor,et al.  The development of children's beliefs about social and biological aspects of gender differences. , 1996, Child development.

[20]  Fei Xu,et al.  Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[22]  S. Gelman,et al.  Five-year-olds’ beliefs about the discreteness of category boundaries for animals and artifacts , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  S. Denison,et al.  Statistical inference and sensitivity to sampling in 11-month-old infants , 2009, Cognition.

[24]  E. Heit.  Properties of inductive reasoning , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  C. Kalish.  Natural and artifactual kinds: are children realists or relativists about categories? , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[26]  Evan Heit,et al.  Inductive reasoning: Experimental, developmental and computational approaches , 2007 .

[27]  Nancy S. Kim,et al.  From symptoms to causes: Diversity effects in diagnostic reasoning , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[28]  E. Heit,et al.  Diversity-Based Reasoning in Children , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Defending Diversity , 2007 .

[30]  L. Rips.  Inductive judgments about natural categories. , 1975 .

[31]  Alejandro López.  The diversity principle in the testing of arguments , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[32]  D L Medin,et al.  Expertise and category-based induction. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.