Abstract. Ahead of the elaborate rotor optimisation modelling that would support detailed design, it is shown that significant insight and new design directions can be indicated with simple, high level analyses based on actuator disc theory. The basic equations derived from actuator disc theory for rotor power, axial thrust and out of plane bending moment in any given wind condition involve essentially only the rotor radius, R, and the axial induction factor, a. Radius, bending moment or thrust may be constrained or fixed with quite different rotor optimisations resulting in each case. The case of fixed radius or rotor diameter leads to conventional rotor design and the long-established result that power is maximised with an axial induction factor, a = 1 / 3. When the out of plane bending moment is constrained to a fixed value with axial induction variable in value (but constant radially) and when rotor radius is also variable, an optimum axial induction of 1 / 5 is determined. This leads to a rotor that is expanded in diameter 11.6 % gaining 7.6 % in power and with thrust reduced by 10 %. This is the “low induction rotor” which has been investigated by Chaviaropoulos (2013). However, with an optimum radially varying distribution of axial induction, the same 7.6 % power gain can be obtained with only 6.7 % expansion in rotor diameter. When without constraint on bending moment, the thrust is constrained to a fixed value, the power is maximised as a → 0 which for finite power extraction would require R → ∞. This result is relevant when secondary rotors are used for power extraction from a primary rotor. To avoid too much loss of the source power available from the primary rotor, the secondary rotors must operate at very low induction factors whilst avoiding too high a tip speed or an excessive rotor diameter. Some general design issues of secondary rotors are explored. It is suggested that they may have most practical potential for large vertical axis turbines avoiding the severe penalties on drive train cost and weight implicit in the usual method of power extraction from a central shaft.
[1]
W. Tollmien,et al.
Über Tragflügel kleinsten induzierten Widerstandes
,
1961
.
[2]
B. G. Newman.
MULTIPLE ACTUATOR-DISC THEORY FOR WIND TURBINES
,
1986
.
[3]
Herman Snel,et al.
Review of Aerodynamics for Wind Turbines
,
2003
.
[4]
Jens Nørkær Sørensen,et al.
Analysis of counter-rotating wind turbines
,
2007
.
[5]
Peter Jamieson,et al.
Innovation in Wind Turbine Design
,
2011
.
[6]
S. Voutsinas,et al.
Moving Towards Large ( r ) Rotors Is that a good idea ?
,
2012
.
[7]
Deliverable,et al.
New aerodynamics rotor concepts specifically for very large offshore wind turbines Deliverable 2
,
2013
.
[8]
Anupam Sharma,et al.
A Novel Dual-Rotor Turbine for Increased Wind Energy Capture
,
2014
.
[9]
Harald G. Svendsen,et al.
Outcomes of the DeepWind conceptual design
,
2015
.
[10]
Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.
Free-Form Design of Low Induction Rotors
,
2015
.
[11]
Sugiyono,et al.
Investigation of Counter-Rotating Wind Turbine Performance using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation
,
2017
.
[12]
Vu Minh Phap,et al.
Comparative Study Of Velocity Deficit Calculation Methods For A Wind Farm In Vietnam
,
2017
.
[13]
Fabian Wendt,et al.
Investigation of Innovative Rotor Concepts for the Big Adaptive Rotor Project
,
2019
.