Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.

AIM Various modalities are used as an adjunct to mammography for differentiation of potentially suspicious breast lesions. Electrical impedance scanning (EIS) is a new technique based upon the principle that cancer cells exhibit altered local dielectric properties and thus show measurably higher conductivity values. The accuracy of differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions was evaluated to determine whether EIS duplicates or supplements the results obtainable from ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred mammographically suspicious lesions were examined using US, MRI and EIS. Definitive histology was acquired through either lesion biopsy or surgical excision. RESULTS Fifty of 62 malignant lesions were correctly identified using EIS (81% overall sensitivity), 24/38 benign lesions were correctly identified as benign (63% specificity). Negative predictive value and positive predictive value of 67 and 78% were observed, respectively. kappa-factor evaluation revealed a value of 0.82 between MRI and EIS and 0.62 between US and EIS. CONCLUSIONS EIS may be a valuable adjunct for differentiation of suspicious mammographic lesions. Based upon the calculated kappa-factor, EIS results supplement US examinations. Artifacts (superficial skin lesions, poor contact, air bubbles) currently result in the high false-positive rate of EIS.

[1]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. , 1998, Radiology.

[2]  T. Boehm,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results , 2000, European Radiology.

[3]  Stuchly,et al.  Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  W A Kaiser.  [Magnetic resonance tomography of the breast. The results of 253 examinations]. , 1989, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[5]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.

[6]  A Heinig,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[7]  M. Morrow,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of abnormal mammographic findings to avoid unnecessary breast biopsies. , 1994, Archives of surgery.

[8]  E. Frei,et al.  Breast cancer screening by impedance measurements. , 1990, Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering.

[9]  J Jossinet,et al.  The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[10]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. , 1999, Radiology.

[11]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.