Animated Graphics for Comparing Two Risks: A Cautionary Tale
暂无分享,去创建一个
Holly O Witteman | Nicole L Exe | Brian J Zikmund-Fisher | Nicole L. Exe | Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis | Valerie C Kahn | Mark Dickson | Valerie C. Kahn | H. Witteman | B. Zikmund‐Fisher | Mark Dickson | A. Fuhrel-Forbis
[1] Margaret M Hansen,et al. Versatile, Immersive, Creative and Dynamic Virtual 3-D Healthcare Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.
[2] M. Galesic,et al. Graph Literacy , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[3] Abdallah Namoune,et al. Getting the message across: visual attention, aesthetic design and what users remember , 2008, DIS '08.
[4] G Gigerenzer,et al. The Psychology of Good Judgment , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[5] B. Rimer,et al. General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[6] M. Galesic,et al. Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected]. , 2010, Social science & medicine.
[7] Y. Hanoch,et al. Presentation Format Affects Comprehension and Risk Assessment: The Case of Prenatal Screening , 2009, Journal of health communication.
[8] P. Slovic,et al. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. , 2007, Health affairs.
[9] Barbara Tversky,et al. Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[10] Angela Fagerlin,et al. Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics , 2008, Cancer.
[11] R. Mayer,et al. Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning , 2002 .
[12] P. Ubel,et al. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.
[13] C. F. Kao,et al. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.
[14] Angela Fagerlin,et al. Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.
[15] T. Fahey,et al. Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews , 1995, BMJ.
[16] H. Tabbers,et al. Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.
[17] D. Berry,et al. Effects of active information processing on the understanding of risk information , 2005 .
[18] Slava Kalyuga,et al. Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[19] Kar Yan Tam,et al. Does Animation Attract Online Users' Attention? The Effects of Flash on Information Search Performance and Perceptions , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..
[20] Andrew N Freedman,et al. Representing randomness in the communication of individualized cancer risk estimates: effects on cancer risk perceptions, worry, and subjective uncertainty about risk. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.
[21] Angela Fagerlin,et al. Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice , 2008, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.
[22] Jessica S. Ancker,et al. Effect of Arrangement of Stick Figures on Estimates of Proportion in Risk Graphics , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[23] M. Brundage,et al. Further Insight into the Perception of Quantitative Information: Judgments of Gist in Treatment Decisions , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[24] Erika A. Waters,et al. Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[25] Cara L Cuite,et al. A Test of Numeric Formats for Communicating Risk Probabilities , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[26] James Minogue,et al. Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics , 2009, Comput. Educ..
[27] Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher,et al. The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[28] Mary Hegarty,et al. When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[29] Winston R. Sieck,et al. Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance , 2003 .
[30] P. Ubel,et al. Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[31] Christopher K. Hsee,et al. Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.
[32] W. Gaissmaier,et al. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information. , 2012, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.
[33] E. Weber,et al. Effects of Game-Like Interactive Graphics on Risk Perceptions and Decisions , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[34] Time to Retire the 1-in-X Risk Format , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[35] P. Ubel,et al. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[36] H. Witteman,et al. Cool but Counterproductive: Interactive, Web-Based Risk Communications Can Backfire , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.
[37] P. Ubel,et al. A Demonstration of ‘‘Less Can Be More’’ in Risk Graphics , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[38] Erika A. Waters,et al. Formats for Improving Risk Communication in Medical Tradeoff Decisions , 2006, Journal of health communication.
[39] C. McHorney,et al. Frequency or Probability? A Qualitative Study of Risk Communication Formats Used in Health Care , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[40] C. K. Mertz,et al. Less Is More in Presenting Quality Information to Consumers , 2007, Medical care research and review : MCRR.
[41] Erol Özçelik,et al. Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[42] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.
[43] Michael Siegrist,et al. Risk communication with pictographs: The role of numeracy and graph processing , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.