Reference tissue quantification of DCE-MRI data without a contrast agent calibration

The quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI data conventionally requires a conversion from signal intensity to contrast agent concentration by measuring a change in the tissue longitudinal relaxation rate, R(1). In this paper, it is shown that the use of a spoiled gradient-echo acquisition sequence (optimized so that signal intensity scales linearly with contrast agent concentration) in conjunction with a reference tissue-derived vascular input function (VIF), avoids the need for the conversion to Gd-DTPA concentration. This study evaluates how to optimize such sequences and which dynamic time-series parameters are most suitable for this type of analysis. It is shown that signal difference and relative enhancement provide useful alternatives when full contrast agent quantification cannot be achieved, but that pharmacokinetic parameters derived from both contain sources of error (such as those caused by differences between reference tissue and region of interest proton density and native T(1) values). It is shown in a rectal cancer study that these sources of uncertainty are smaller when using signal difference, compared with relative enhancement (15 +/- 4% compared with 33 +/- 4%). Both of these uncertainties are of the order of those associated with the conversion to Gd-DTPA concentration, according to literature estimates.

[1]  D J Collins,et al.  Reproducibility of reference tissue quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced data: comparison with a fixed vascular input function , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  A. Padhani Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: Current status and future directions , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI studies: Fundamental concepts and simulations , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  G S Karczmar,et al.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: Input functions derived from reference tissues , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  J R Griffiths,et al.  Clinical studies. , 2005, Advances in pharmacology.

[6]  J. Gore,et al.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Variation of the relaxographic “shutter‐speed” for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus‐tracking curve shape , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  M Recht,et al.  Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J A d'Arcy,et al.  Applications of sliding window reconstruction with cartesian sampling for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[12]  Jeffrey L Duerk,et al.  Determining and optimizing the precision of quantitative measurements of perfusion from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  F. Kelcz,et al.  Accurate and rapid quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MR imaging using spoiled gradient‐recalled echoes and bookend T1 measurements , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  D J Collins,et al.  Evaluation of response to treatment using DCE-MRI: the relationship between initial area under the gadolinium curve (IAUGC) and quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  K. Scheffler,et al.  DCE-MRI in clinical trials: data acquisition techniques and analysis methods. , 2003, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[16]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.