Online Vs Face-to-face Web-development Course: Course Strategies, Learning, and Engagement

To address the increasing enrollment in Computer Science (CS), face-to-face (F2F) courses are often redesigned to online courses. For the success of a large-enrollment online CS class, it is important to design it with effective strategies that can enhance student learning and engagement. With this aim, we developed an online, third year web-development course, and redesigned its existing F2F version. This study focuses on examining the course strategies utilized in the two versions of of the course, and how students' learning and engagement vary between these two offerings. In Fall 2019, we conducted experimental research with pre- and post-tests to collect data from these two sections. The participants of the study include 51 out of 103 online students, and 38 out of 72 F2F students. We identified course strategies that were more valuable to one group versus the other, and both the sections. In terms of student learning, we found that there was no significant difference between these sections. Behavioral engagement measures depicted how the online and F2F students engaged within their courses, and how it is related to students' learning. We also found how the level of engagement varied in the online course according to the engagement factors that include performance, emotions, skills, and participation. The results of this study will inform online, F2F, and hybrid course design of upper-level CS courses.

[1]  Amy S. Beavers,et al.  Practical Considerations for Using Exploratory Factor Analysis in Educational Research. , 2013 .

[2]  David Joyner,et al.  Online or In Person?: Student Motivations in the Choice of a CS1 Experience , 2019, SIGCSE.

[3]  Debarati Basu,et al.  Evaluation of Course Strategies: Face-to-Face vs. Online , 2020, ICER.

[4]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[5]  J. Buelow,et al.  Supporting Learning Engagement with Online Students , 2018, Online Learning.

[6]  Angela Lee,et al.  Learning online, offline, and in-between: comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities , 2018, Education and Information Technologies.

[7]  Florence Martin,et al.  Using Learning Analytics to Enhance Student Learning in Online Courses Based on Quality Matters Standards , 2016 .

[8]  R. R. Aman Improving student satisfaction and retention with online instruction through systematic faculty peer review of courses , 2009 .

[9]  Wei Ding,et al.  Design and evolution of an undergraduate course on web application development , 2004, ITiCSE '04.

[10]  Said Hadjerrouit,et al.  Web-based application development: a software engineering approach , 2001, SGCS.

[11]  M. Boekaerts,et al.  Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process , 2016 .

[12]  David Olson A comparison of online and lecture methods for delivering the CS 1 course , 2002 .

[13]  F. Butts,et al.  Comparing Student Engagement in Online and Face-to-Face Instruction in Health and Physical Education Teacher Preparation. , 2013 .

[14]  J. Swinton,et al.  Online vs. Face-to-Face: A Comparison of Student Outcomes with Random Assignment , 2018 .

[15]  David Joyner,et al.  Replicating and Unraveling Performance and Behavioral Differences between an Online and a Traditional CS Course , 2019, CompEd.

[16]  Beryl C. McEwen,et al.  Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies , 2007 .

[17]  Marcia D. Dixson Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). , 2015 .

[18]  Brian Dorn,et al.  A statistical analysis of student performance in online computer science courses , 2004, SIGCSE '04.

[19]  Kevin R. Parker,et al.  Navigating the Framework Jungle for Teaching Web Application Development , 2013 .

[20]  Ye Diana Wang Teaching web development at a distance , 2011, SIGITE '11.

[21]  Kiran Budhrani,et al.  Influence of Course Design on Student Engagement and Motivation in an Online Course , 2020, SIGCSE.

[22]  Kevin Treu To teach the unteachable class: an experimental course in web-based application design , 2002, SIGCSE '02.

[23]  Jasmine Paul,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in an Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009 to 2016 , 2019, Front. Comput. Sci..

[24]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[25]  Byeong Ho Kang,et al.  A comparative study of online and face-to-face embedded systems learning course , 2018, ACE.

[26]  Marcia D. Dixson Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? , 2010 .

[27]  D. Robert Adams,et al.  Integration early: a new approach to teaching web application development , 2007 .

[28]  George D. Kuh,et al.  What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement , 2009 .

[29]  David Jones,et al.  Indicators of engagement , 2010 .