The neural processing of masked speech: evidence for different mechanisms in the left and right temporal lobes.

It has been previously demonstrated that extensive activation in the dorsolateral temporal lobes associated with masking a speech target with a speech masker, consistent with the hypothesis that competition for central auditory processes is an important factor in informational masking. Here, masking from speech and two additional maskers derived from the original speech were investigated. One of these is spectrally rotated speech, which is unintelligible and has a similar (inverted) spectrotemporal profile to speech. The authors also controlled for the possibility of "glimpsing" of the target signal during modulated masking sounds by using speech-modulated noise as a masker in a baseline condition. Functional imaging results reveal that masking speech with speech leads to bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG) activation relative to a speech-in-noise baseline, while masking speech with spectrally rotated speech leads solely to right STG activation relative to the baseline. This result is discussed in terms of hemispheric asymmetries for speech perception, and interpreted as showing that masking effects can arise through two parallel neural systems, in the left and right temporal lobes. This has implications for the competition for resources caused by speech and rotated speech maskers, and may illuminate some of the mechanisms involved in informational masking.

[1]  André Brechmann,et al.  Hemispheric shifts of sound representation in auditory cortex with conceptual listening. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Functional imaging and language: A critical guide to methodology and analysis , 2003, Speech Commun..

[3]  R J Wise,et al.  Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B Blesser,et al.  Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation. I. Phonetic characteristics. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Identifying separate neural sub-systems within 'Wernicke's area' , 2001 .

[7]  R. Patterson,et al.  The Processing of Temporal Pitch and Melody Information in Auditory Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[8]  V Ball,et al.  Lip-reading the BKB sentence lists: corrections for list and practice effects. , 1993, British journal of audiology.

[9]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech--a positron emission tomography study. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D S Brungart,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J Ashburner,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in six normal and two aphasic subjects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Phonological Grammar Shapes the Auditory Cortex: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Wilgus,et al.  High quality time-scale modification for speech , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[15]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  S. Scott,et al.  Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Sophie K Scott,et al.  Auditory processing — speech, space and auditory objects , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  S. Scott,et al.  The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception , 2004, Cognition.

[21]  A. Macleod,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[22]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  P. Matthews,et al.  Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[25]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Sensitivity to Auditory Object Features in Human Temporal Neocortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.