Quality of low secure services in the UK: development and use of the Quality of Environment In Low Secure Services (QELS) checklist

Abstract Low secure services provide care for psychiatric patients whose risk cannot be safely managed in other settings. The physical environment in these units plays an important role in supporting recovery and risk management. We developed the Quality of Environment in Low secure Services (QELS) checklist to assess the quality of the physical environment of these services. Using recommendations from previously published standards we piloted a draft checklist with a weighted scoring system reflecting the views of patients and providers. The checklist showed good criterion validity and inter-rater reliability. Data collected from 33 low secure services showed considerable variation in the quality of the physical environment. The QELS checklist provides an accessible and reliable means for managers and clinicians to assess whether the quality of the physical environment of low secure units meets recommended standards and can be used to support efforts to improve the quality of care delivered by these services.

[1]  G. Gudjonsson,et al.  See, Think, Act Scale: preliminary development and validation of a measure of relational security in medium- and low-secure units , 2012 .

[2]  L. Appleby,et al.  Implementation of mental health service recommendations in England and Wales and suicide rates, 1997–2006: a cross-sectional and before-and-after observational study , 2012, The Lancet.

[3]  Harry G. Kennedy,et al.  The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study , 2011, BMC psychiatry.

[4]  S. Duggan,et al.  Forensic mental health services: facts and figures on current provision , 2008 .

[5]  Samuel A. DiGangi,et al.  Assessing unidimensionality: A comparison of Rasch modeling, Parallel analysis, and TETRAD , 2007 .

[6]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[7]  D. Cook,et al.  Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. , 2006, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  Michael Collins,et al.  The Security Needs Assessment Profile: A Multidimensional Approach to Measuring Security Needs , 2005 .

[9]  Harry G. Kennedy Therapeutic uses of security: mapping forensic mental health services by stratifying risk , 2002 .

[10]  Graham Thornicroft,et al.  National Service Framework for Mental Health , 2000 .

[11]  D. Davidson The National Service Framework for Mental Health , 2000 .

[12]  Piotr Pierzchniak MRCPsych,et al.  Assessing the needs of patients in secure settings: A multi-disciplinary approach , 1999 .