It is well known that inertial navigation systems can provide high-accuracy position, velocity, and attitude information over short time periods. However, their accuracy rapidly degrades with time. The requirements for an accurate estimation of navigation information necessitate the modeling of the sensors' error components. Several variance techniques have been devised for stochastic modeling of the error of inertial sensors. They are basically very similar and primarily differ in that various signal processings, by way of weighting functions, window functions, etc., are incorporated into the analysis algorithms in order to achieve a particular desired result for improving the model characterizations. The simplest is the Allan variance. The Allan variance is a method of representing the root means square (RMS) random-drift error as a function of averaging time. It is simple to compute and relatively simple to interpret and understand. The Allan variance method can be used to determine the characteristics of the underlying random processes that give rise to the data noise. This technique can be used to characterize various types of error terms in the inertial-sensor data by performing certain operations on the entire length of data. In this paper, the Allan variance technique will be used in analyzing and modeling the error of the inertial sensors used in different grades of the inertial measurement units. By performing a simple operation on the entire length of data, a characteristic curve is obtained whose inspection provides a systematic characterization of various random errors contained in the inertial-sensor output data. Being a directly measurable quantity, the Allan variance can provide information on the types and magnitude of the various error terms. This paper covers both the theoretical basis for the Allan variance for modeling the inertial sensors' error terms and its implementation in modeling different grades of inertial sensors.
[1]
I. Miller.
Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes
,
1966
.
[2]
M. M. Tehrani,et al.
Ring Laser Gyro Data Analysis With Cluster Sampling Technique
,
1983,
Other Conferences.
[3]
Naser El-Sheimy,et al.
Inertial Sensors Errors Modeling Using Allan Variance
,
2003
.
[4]
D. W. Allan,et al.
Time and Frequency (Time-Domain) Characterization, Estimation, and Prediction of Precision Clocks and Oscillators
,
1987,
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[5]
Bruce Conroy,et al.
Measurement of Allan variance and phase noise at fractions of a millihertz
,
1990
.
[6]
C. Audoin,et al.
Characterization of Frequency Stability: Uncertainty due to the Finite Number of Measurements
,
1973
.
[7]
D. W. Allan,et al.
A Modified "Allan Variance" with Increased Oscillator Characterization Ability
,
1981
.
[8]
Athanasios Papoulis,et al.
Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes
,
1965
.
[9]
D. W. Allan,et al.
Statistics of atomic frequency standards
,
1966
.
[10]
M. S. Keshner.
1/f noise
,
1982,
Proceedings of the IEEE.
[11]
Haiying Hou,et al.
Modeling inertial sensors errors using Allan variance
,
2004
.
[12]
J. Chaffee.
Relating the Allan Variance to the Diffusion Coefficients of a Linear Stochastic Differential Equation Model for Precision Oscillators
,
1987,
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.