Pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic modeling of the central nervous system effects of midazolam and its main metabolite α‐hydroxymidazolam in healthy volunteers

The pharmacodynamics of midazolam and its main metabolite α‐hydroxymidazolam were characterized in individual subjects by use of saccadic eye movement and electroencephalographic (EEG) effect measurements. Eight healthy volunteers received 0.1 mg/kg midazolam intravenously in 15 minutes, 0.15 mg/kg α‐hydroxymidazolam intravenously in 15 minutes, 7.5 mg midazolam orally and placebo in a randomized, double‐blind, four‐way crossover experiment. Plasma concentrations of midazolam, α‐hydroxymidazolam and 4‐hydroxymidazolam were measured by gas chromatography. The amplitudes in the 11.5 to 30 Hz (beta) frequency band were used as EEG effect measure. The concentration‐effect relationships were quantified by the sigmoid maximum effect model. The median effective concentrations of midazolam and α‐hydroxymidazolam were (mean ± SE) 77 ± 15 and 98 ± 17 ng/ml, respectively, for the EEG effect measure. For peak saccadic velocity the values were 40 ± 7 ng/ml for midazolam and 49 ± 10 ng/ml for α‐hydroxymidazolam. The maximum effect values were similar for both compounds. The effects observed after oral administration of midazolam could not be predicted accurately by an additive and competitive interaction model. It seems that α‐hydroxymidazolam is highly potent with respect to the measured effects and contributes significantly to those effects of midazolam after oral administration.

[1]  M. Danhof,et al.  Quantification of the EEG Effect of Midazolam by Aperiodic Analysis in Volunteers , 1990, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[2]  H. Schoemaker,et al.  A comparison of the sensitivities of adaptive tracking, eye movement analysis, and visual analog lines to the effects of incremental doses of temazepam in healthy volunteers , 1991, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Semiparametric approach to pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  D. Hommer,et al.  Benzodiazepine sensitivity in normal human subjects. , 1986, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  M. Eckert,et al.  Comparison of the effects of intravenously administered midazolam, triazolam and their hydroxy metabolites. , 1983, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[6]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Rate of entrance of benzodiazepines into the brain determined by eye movement recording. , 1983, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[7]  D. Greenblatt,et al.  Concentration‐independent plasma protein binding of benzodiazepines , 1983, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[8]  M Danhof,et al.  Differences in intrinsic efficacy of benzodiazepines are reflected in their concentration‐EEG effect relationship , 1992, British journal of pharmacology.

[9]  M Danhof,et al.  Pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic modeling of midazolam effects on the human central nervous system , 1988, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[10]  P. Heizmann,et al.  Relationship between plasma concentration and effect of midazolam after oral and intravenous administration. , 1983, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[11]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[12]  M. Sunzel Determination of midazolam and the alpha-hydroxy metabolite by gas chromatography in small plasma volumes. , 1989, Journal of chromatography.

[13]  P. Kroboth,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of the Newer Benzodiazepines , 1989, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[14]  D. Greenblatt,et al.  Effect of Age, Gender, and Obesity on Midazolam Kinetics , 1984, Anesthesiology.

[15]  Willy Haefely,et al.  Recent advances in the molecular pharmacology of Benzodiazepine receptors and in the structure-activity relationships of their agonists and antagonists , 1985 .

[16]  P. Hartvig,et al.  Relation of sedation and amnesia to plasma concentrations of midazolam in surgical patients , 1988, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[17]  L F Dell'Osso,et al.  Saccadic velocity characteristics: intrinsic variability and fatigue. , 1979, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  U Klotz,et al.  Midazolam kinetics , 1981, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[19]  B L Ehrenberg,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and electroencephalographic study of intravenous diazepam, midazolam, and placebo , 1989, Clinical pharmacology and therapy.

[20]  P Heizmann,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of midazolam in man. , 1983, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[21]  S. Garattini,et al.  Formation of active metabolites of psychotropic drugs. An updated review of their significance. , 1990, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[22]  M. Gibaldi,et al.  Noncompartmental Analysis Based on Statistical Moment Theory , 1982 .

[23]  M. Danhof,et al.  Pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic modelling of the EEG effects of midazolam in individual rats: influence of rate and route of administration , 1991, British journal of pharmacology.

[24]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Overlapping saccades and glissades are produced by fatigue in the saccadic eye movement system , 1975, Experimental Neurology.