Grammatical gender selection and the representation of morphemes: The production of Dutch diminutives

In this study, we investigated grammatical feature selection during noun phrase production in Dutch. More specifically, we studied the conditions under which different grammatical genders select either the same or different determiners. Pictures of simple objects paired with a gender-congruent or a gender-incongruent distractor word were presented. Participants named the pictures using a noun phrase with the appropriate gender-marked determiner. Auditory (Experiment 1) or visual cues (Experiment 2) indicated whether the noun was to be produced in its standard or diminutive form. Results revealed a cost in naming latencies when target and distractor take different determiner forms independent of whether or not they have the same gender. This replicates earlier results showing that congruency effects are due to competition during the selection of determiner forms rather than gender features. The overall pattern of results supports the view that grammatical feature selection is an automatic consequence of lexical node selection and therefore not subject to interference from incongruent grammatical features. Selection of the correct determiner form, however, is a competitive process, implying that lexical node and grammatical feature selection operate with distinct principles.

[1]  A Caramazza,et al.  The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The production of determiners: evidence from French , 2002, Cognition.

[4]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[5]  Lorella Lotto,et al.  Grammatical gender is selected in bare noun production: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm , 2005 .

[6]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[7]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Selection of gender-marked morphemes in speech production. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Albert Costa,et al.  The Gender Congruity Effect: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan , 1999 .

[9]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch , 2003 .

[10]  Peter A. Starreveld,et al.  On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production , 2000 .

[11]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The Selection of Grammatical Features in Word Production: The Case of Plural Nouns in German , 2002, Brain and Language.

[12]  H Schriefers,et al.  Priming Effects from Phonologically Related Distractors in Picture—Word Interference , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  W. Glaser Picture naming , 1992, Cognition.

[14]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  W. La Heij,et al.  The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks , 1998 .

[16]  Albert Costa,et al.  Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes in language production. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The selection of closed-class words in noun phrase production: The case of Dutch determiners , 2003 .

[18]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Phonological facilitation of grammatical gender retrieval , 2004 .

[19]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[20]  Albert Costa,et al.  The gender congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: evidence from croatian. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  J J van Berkum,et al.  Syntactic processes in speech production: the retrieval of grammatical gender. , 1997, Cognition.

[22]  H Schriefers,et al.  Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: the gender interference effect in German. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  Where does gender come from? Evidence from a complex inflectional system , 2005, Language and cognitive processes.

[24]  Geert Booij,et al.  The Morphology of Dutch , 2002 .

[25]  F.-Xavier Alario,et al.  A cross-linguistic investigation of determiner production , 2001 .

[26]  H. Schriefers Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases , 1993 .

[27]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Determiner selection in noun phrase production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Albert Costa,et al.  The absence of a gender congruency effect in romance languages: a matter of stimulus onset asynchrony? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Gerard O'Brien,et al.  Putting content into a vehicle theory of consciousness , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Dominance affects determiner selection in language production , 2005 .