Integrating Econometric and Input-Output Models in a Multiregional Context

ABSTRACT This paper explores the extension of integrated econometric/input‐output models from a single to a multiregional context. A number of methodological issues associated with existing treatments of extraregional relations in both traditional multiregional econometric models and the more recent single region integrated models are discussed. A series of new approaches are introduced that rely on the integration of econometric and input‐output methods to specify extraregional linkages. A comparison of these alternative modeling approaches is undertaken using employment series for 5 regions in Southern California. The forecasting accuracies are evaluated in a series of out‐of‐sample forecasting experiments. The findings suggest that the forecasting performance of the multiregional extensions of the integrated approach is competitive with the performance of single region implementations. The performance of the alternative multiregional approaches is found to be relatively more sensitive to regionalization of the IO component and the level of industrial disaggregation than to the incorporation of distance in the specification of the multiregional linkages.

[1]  Geoffrey J. D. Hewings,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF INTERREGIONAL INPUT‐OUTPUT MODELS FOR INDONESIA UNDER CONDITIONS OF LIMITED INFORMATION* , 1993 .

[2]  Paul A. Coomes,et al.  Using a Metropolitan-area Econometric Model to Analyse Economic Development Proposals , 1991 .

[3]  N. Glickman,et al.  A MULTIREGIONAL ECONOMETRIC FORECASTING SYSTEM: A MODEL FOR THE DELAWARE VALLEY* , 1977 .

[4]  George I. Treyz,et al.  SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIREGIONAL FORECASTING AND POLICY SIMULATION MODELS , 1980 .

[5]  Sergio J. Rey The Performance of Alternative Integration Strategies for Combining Regional Econometric and Input-Output Models , 1998 .

[6]  G. Treyz,et al.  Conjoining an Input-Output Model and a Policy Analysis Model: A Case Study of the Regional Economic Effects of Expanding a Port Facility , 1981 .

[7]  Benjamin H. Stevens,et al.  A New Technique for the Construction of Non-Survey Regional Input-Output Models , 1983 .

[8]  Se-Hark Park,et al.  ERRORS IN REGIONAL NONSURVEY INPUT‐OUTPUT MODELS: ANALYTICAL AND SIMULATION RESULTS* , 1981 .

[9]  Benjamin H. Stevens,et al.  Error Generation in Regional Input-Output Analysis and Its Implications for Nonsurvey Models , 1980 .

[10]  K Moghadam,et al.  Small Area Modeling of the Industrial Sector (SAMIS): An Integrated Econometric—Interindustry Approach , 1988 .

[11]  Kenneth P. Ballard,et al.  The structure of a large-scale small-area multiregional model of California: Modelling an integrated system of urban, suburban and rural growth , 1983 .

[12]  James P. LeSage,et al.  ECONOMETRIC MODELING OF INTERREGIONAL LABOR MARKET LINKAGES , 1986 .

[13]  Arthur E. King,et al.  Conjoining an Ohio Input-Output Model with an Econometric Model of Ohio , 1977 .

[14]  Richard S. ConwayJr. Simulation properties of a regional interindustry econometric model , 1979 .

[15]  Paul A. Coomes,et al.  The Interindustry Employment Demand Variable: An Extension of the I-SAMIS Technique for Linking Input—Output and Econometric Models , 1991 .

[16]  Poulicos Prastacos,et al.  Industrial and spatial interdependency in modeling: An employment forecasting model for the counties in the San Francisco Bay Region , 1985 .

[17]  Robert E. Garhart,et al.  THE ROLE OF ERROR STRUCTURE IN SIMULATIONS ON REGIONAL INPUT‐OUTPUT ANALYSIS* , 1985 .

[18]  Geoffrey J. D. Hewings,et al.  SPACE‐TIME EMPLOYMENT MODELING: SOME RESULTS USING SEEMINGLY UNRELATED REGRESSION ESTIMATORS* , 1982 .

[19]  Raymond J.G.M. Florax,et al.  The Impacts of Misspecified Spatial Interaction in Linear Regression Models , 1995 .

[20]  John R. Kort,et al.  The NRIES II Multiregional Macroeconomic Model of the United States , 1991 .

[21]  James P. LeSage,et al.  The dynamic relationship between export, local, and total area employment☆ , 1989 .

[22]  G. West,et al.  Comparison of Input–Output, Input–Output + Econometric and Computable General Equilibrium Impact Models at the Regional Level , 1995 .

[23]  Sergio J. Rey,et al.  Integrating Regional Econometric and Input—Output Models: An Evaluation of Embedding Strategies , 1997 .

[24]  Catherine Ann Baird,et al.  A MULTIREGIONAL ECONOMETRIC MODEL OF OHIO , 1983 .

[25]  Robert E. Garhart,et al.  NONSURVEY INPUT‐OUTPUT ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES: EVIDENCE ON THE STRUCTURE OF ERRORS , 1987 .

[26]  Sharon M. Brucker,et al.  Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Comparison of Five "Ready-Made" Model Systems , 1987 .

[27]  Carol A. Taylor Econometric modeling of urban and other substate areas: An analysis of alternative methodologies , 1982 .

[28]  Mark Edward Stover A comparison of annual and benchmark input-output tables in regional economic modeling , 1994 .

[29]  Guy R. West A QUEENSLAND INPUT‐OUTPUT ECONOMETRIC MODEL: AN OVERVIEW , 1991 .

[30]  Ballard Kp,et al.  The national-regional impact evaluation system: a spatial model of U.S. economic and demographic activity. , 1980 .

[31]  Zheng Pan,et al.  Using Spatial Contiguity as Bayesian Prior Information in Regional Forecasting Models , 1995 .

[32]  R. M. Beemiller,et al.  Linking Regional Economic Models for Policy Analysis , 1986 .

[33]  R. S. Conway The Washington Projection and Simulation Model: A Regional Interindustry Econometric Model , 1990 .