THE STABILITY OF PHONOLOGICAL FEATURES WITHIN AND ACROSS SEGMENTS THE EFFECT OF NASALIZATION ON FRICATION

This paper argues that the articulatory-acoustic stability of phonological features may be affected not only by concurrent features, but also by features in adjacent segments which may coincide in time due to coarticulatory overlap. Specifically, the paper illustrates how frication may be endangered by concurrent and coarticulatory nasality. We review aerodynamic and acoustic evidence showing that fricatives tend to be impaired and become unstable with co-occurring nasalization. Then we examine the stability of fricatives when they come in contact with nasality in adjacent segments. An experiment is described where aerodynamic and acoustic data were obtained for fricative + nasal sequences at slow and fast rates. The results show that anticipatory velophrayngeal opening during the acoustic duration of the fricative vents the high oral pressure required for audible frication, thus providing support for the claim that the same physical principles disfavoring the combination of frication and nasality within a segment are at play when these features combine across segments. It is argued that the instability of frication when combined with nasalization may be at the origin of a number of phonological patterns.

[1]  Maria-Josep Solé COMPATIBILITY OF FEATURES AND PHONETIC CONTENT. THE CASE OF NASALIZATION , 2007 .

[2]  F. Moll,et al.  Gramàtica històrica catalana , 1991 .

[3]  B. Lindblom,et al.  On the Notion "Possible Speech Sound , 1990 .

[4]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of trills , 1998 .

[5]  Emma Gregores,et al.  A description of colloquial Guaraní , 1967 .

[6]  Ian Watson,et al.  More evidence for the perceptual basis of sound change? suprasegmental effects in the development of distinctive nasalization , 1998, ICSLP.

[7]  John J. Ohala,et al.  THE PHONETICS OF NASAL PHONOLOGY: THEOREMS AND DATA , 1993 .

[8]  H. Kawasaki-Fukumori,et al.  An Acoustical Basis for Universal Phonotactic Constraints , 1992, Language and speech.

[9]  Maria-Josep Solé Assimìlatory processes and aerodynamic factors , 2002 .

[10]  D. Recasens Weakening and strengthening in romance revisited: 1760 , 2002 .

[11]  T. Schadeberg,et al.  Nasalization in UMbundu , 1982 .

[12]  S. Maeda ACOUSTICS OF VOWEL NASALIZATION AND ARTICULATORY SHIFTS IN FRENCH NASAL VOWELS , 1993 .

[13]  Máximo Torreblanca Espinosa,et al.  Estudio del habla de Villena y su comarca , 1981 .

[14]  B. Lindblom Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[15]  John Local,et al.  Variable domains and variable relevance: interpreting phonetic exponents , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[16]  P. Keating,et al.  On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing , 1986, Journal of Linguistics.

[17]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[18]  K. Munhall,et al.  Coarticulation: Theory, Data, and Techniques , 2001 .

[19]  J. Ohala The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .

[20]  Ryan Keith Shosted,et al.  The Aeroacoustics of Nasalized Fricatives , 2006 .

[21]  D. Whalen,et al.  Connections between Nasality and Vowel Duration and Height: Elucidation of the Eastern Algonquian Intrusive Nasal , 1989 .

[22]  R Daniloff,et al.  Intrusive Stops in Nasal-Fricative Clusters: An Aerodynamic and Acoustic Investigation , 1979, Phonetica.

[23]  Abigail C. Cohn THE STATUS OF NASALIZED CONTINUANTS , 1993 .

[24]  F. Moll,et al.  Diccionari català-valencià-balear , 1930 .

[25]  Maria-Josep Solé,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[26]  Marie K. Huffman,et al.  Nasals, nasalization, and the velum , 1993 .

[27]  J. Ohala Articulatory Constraints on the Cognitive Representation of Speech , 1981 .

[28]  A. C. Gimson,et al.  An introduction to the pronunciation of English , 1991 .

[29]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[30]  W. E. Welmers African Language Structures , 1974 .