Turgut Tatlisumak Stroke Care : European Perspective Implication of the Recent Positive Endovascular Intervention Trials for Organizing Acute

—Timely recanalization leads to improved patient outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. Recent trial results demonstrated a strong benefit for endovascular therapies over standard medical care in patients with acute ischemic stroke and a major intracranial artery occlusion ≤6 hours or even beyond from symptom onset and independent of patients' age. Previous studies have shown the benefit of intravenous thrombolysis that had gradually, albeit slowly, reshaped acute stroke care worldwide. Now, given the superior benefits of endovascular intervention, the whole structure of acute stroke care needs to be reorganized to meet patient needs and to deliver evidence-based treatments effectively. However, a blueprint for success with novel stroke treatments should be composed of numerous elements and requires efforts from various parties. Regarding the endovascular therapies, the strengths of Europe include highly organized democratic society structures, high rate of urbanization, well-developed revenue-based healthcare systems, and high income levels, whereas the obstacles include the east-west disparity in wealth, the ongoing economic crisis hindering spread of fairly costly new treatments, and the quickly aging population putting more demands on health care in general. Regional and national plans for covering whole population with 24/7 adequate acute stroke care are necessary in close cooperation of professionals and decision-makers. Europe-wide new training programs for expert physicians in stroke care should be initiated shortly. European Stroke Organisation has a unique role in providing expertise, consultation, guidelines, and versatile training in meeting new demands in stroke care. This article discusses the current situation, prospects, and challenges in Europe offering personal views on potential solutions. The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association. T imely recanalization is the most powerful predictor of improved outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). 1 However, delay in presentation at a fully equipped stroke center is the major reason why patients with AIS are not eligible for recanalization therapy with intravenous throm-bolysis (IVT) or endovascular interventions (EVI). Early presentation not only increases the proportion of patients treated, but the earlier the treatment is given, the greater the treatment benefit will be: saving 1 minute in initiating IVT leads to one additional healthy day of life in average (hence the term: " save a minute, save a day "). 2 Conversely, delayed treatments are associated with mitigated or no benefits along with an increasing risk for intracranial hemorrhages. 3 Timely arriving patients are evaluated …

[1]  Marie Schmidt,et al.  HEAL TH AT A GLANCE , 2007 .

[2]  M. Krause,et al.  Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  C. Molina,et al.  Early transfer of stroke patients to comprehensive stroke centers: David and Goliath. , 2014, Stroke.

[6]  Geoffrey A. Donnan,et al.  Stroke Thrombolysis: Save a Minute, Save a Day , 2014, Stroke.

[7]  Gerhard Schroth,et al.  National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score and Vessel Occlusion in 2152 Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2013, Stroke.

[8]  J. Majersik,et al.  Percentage of acute stroke patients eligible for endovascular treatment , 2012, Neurology.

[9]  R. Nelson,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke , 2011, Neurology.

[10]  J. Os,et al.  Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010 , 2011, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[11]  E. Connolly,et al.  Current status of endovascular stroke treatment. , 2011, Circulation.

[12]  Gregory W Albers,et al.  Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[13]  B. Bobrow,et al.  The state of emergency stroke resources and care in rural Arizona: a platform for telemedicine. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[14]  H. Cloft,et al.  Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy: An Assessment of Demand and Available Work Force , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  Jeffrey L Saver,et al.  The Impact of Recanalization on Ischemic Stroke Outcome: A Meta-Analysis , 2007, Stroke.