Classifying mammograms by density: rationale and preliminary results

We are doing research on computerized techniques for classifying mammograms as dense or fatty. The hypothesis is that areas of dense tissues are the major factor making certain mammograms harder for both radiologists and computers to interpret. Automatic identification of dense mammograms might therefore permit better use of the time and skills of expert radiologists. Concentrating on the fatty mammograms could also improve the scope for computer-aided detection of abnormalities. Mammograms were independently classified by two radiologists, with a high level of inter-observer agreement. A number of local statistical and texture measures were compared, initially on manually-placed patches of the digitized images. Two strategies for automating the procedure were then compared. The most successful measure (based on grey-level skewness in small tiles) and strategy (automatic patch placement) yield an almost automatic procedure which produces a promising separation between the classes. Evaluation of a fully-automated procedure is in progress.

[1]  F. Winsberg,et al.  Detection of Radiographic Abnormalities in Mammograms by Means of Optical Scanning and Computer Analysis , 1967 .

[2]  J. Wolfe Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. , 1976, Radiology.

[3]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  S. Feig,et al.  Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors. , 1977, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  K. Laws Textured Image Segmentation , 1980 .

[6]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns. Risk indicator for breast cancer? , 1982, JAMA.

[7]  A. Shadagopan,et al.  Computerized quantification of breast duct patterns. , 1982, Radiology.

[8]  Isabelle E. Magnin,et al.  Mammographic Texture Analysis: An Evaluation Of Risk For Developing Breast Cancer , 1986 .

[9]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[10]  Bahaa W. Fam,et al.  The Detection Of Calcification Clusters In Film-Screen Mammograms; A Detailed Algorithmic Approach , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[11]  David R. Dance,et al.  Automatic Detection Of Microcalcifications In Digital Mammograms Using Local Area Thresholding Techniques , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Characterization Of Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern By Fractal Dimension , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[14]  T K Lau,et al.  Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[15]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Classification of Breast Tissue by Texture Analysis , 1991, BMVC.

[16]  J. Law Improved image quality for dense breasts in mammography. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  N. Boyd,et al.  The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. , 1992, Cancer detection and prevention.