Visual representation of Microglial cells in Frontal Cortex region , imaged on a confocal system ( LSM 700-Zeiss ) with Plan-Apochromat 63 X / NA 1 . 4 oil objective

Background: Microglial cells are tissue-resident macrophages of the central nervous system. They are extremely dynamic, sensitive to their microenvironment and present a characteristic complex and heterogeneous morphology and distribution within the brain tissue. Many experimental clues highlight a strong link between their morphology and their function in response to aggression. However, due to their complex “dendritic-like” aspect that constitutes the major pool of murine microglial cells and their dense network, precise and powerful morphological studies are not easy to realize and complicate correlation with molecular or clinical parameters. Methods: Using the knock-in mouse model CX3CR1, we developed a 3D automated confocal tissue imaging system coupled with morphological modelling of many thousands of microglial cells revealing precise and quantitative assessment of major cell features: cell density, cell body area, cytoplasm area and number of primary, secondary and tertiary processes. We determined two morphological criteria that are the complexity index (CI) and the covered environment area (CEA) allowing an innovative approach lying in (i) an accurate and objective study of morphological changes in healthy or pathological condition, (ii) an in situ mapping of the microglial distribution in different neuroanatomical regions and (iii) a study of the clustering of numerous cells, allowing us to discriminate different sub-populations. Results: Our results on more than 20,000 cells by condition confirm at baseline a regional heterogeneity of the microglial distribution and phenotype that persists after induction of neuroinflammation by systemic injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Using clustering analysis, we highlight that, at resting state, microglial cells are distributed in four microglial sub-populations defined by their CI and CEA with a regional pattern and a specific behaviour after challenge. Conclusions: Our results counteract the classical view of a homogenous regional resting state of the microglial cells within the brain. Microglial cells are distributed in different defined sub-populations that present specific behaviour after pathological challenge, allowing postulating for a cellular and functional specialization. Moreover, this new experimental approach will provide a support not only to neuropathological diagnosis but also to study microglial function in various disease models while reducing the number of animals needed to approach the international ethical statements.

[1]  V. Perry,et al.  Microglia regulate hippocampal neurogenesis during chronic neurodegeneration , 2016, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

[2]  A. Nimmerjahn,et al.  TAM receptors regulate multiple features of microglial physiology , 2016, Nature.

[3]  M. Nilsson,et al.  A combined cumulative threshold spectra and digital reconstruction analysis reveal structural alterations of microglia within the prefrontal cortex following low-dose LPS administration , 2015, Neuroscience.

[4]  Lauren M. Mlsna,et al.  A postnatal peak in microglial development in the mouse hippocampus is correlated with heightened sensitivity to seizure triggers , 2015, Brain and behavior.

[5]  U. Nägerl,et al.  Altered morphological dynamics of activated microglia after induction of status epilepticus , 2015, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[6]  Y. Qian,et al.  IL-17A is implicated in lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment in aged rats via microglial activation , 2015, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[7]  K. Blomgren,et al.  Resident microglia, rather than blood‐derived macrophages, contribute to the earlier and more pronounced inflammatory reaction in the immature compared with the adult hippocampus after hypoxia‐ischemia , 2015, Glia.

[8]  K. Ikenaka,et al.  The induction of neuronal death by up-regulated microglial cathepsin H in LPS-induced neuroinflammation , 2015, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[9]  F. Walker,et al.  Quantitative assessment of microglial morphology and density reveals remarkable consistency in the distribution and morphology of cells within the healthy prefrontal cortex of the rat , 2014, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[10]  M. Gaestel,et al.  TNF and Increased Intracellular Iron Alter Macrophage Polarization to a Detrimental M1 Phenotype in the Injured Spinal Cord , 2014, Neuron.

[11]  B. MacVicar,et al.  Activation of Neuronal NMDA Receptors Triggers Transient ATP-Mediated Microglial Process Outgrowth , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  B. Finsen,et al.  Accelerated microglial pathology is associated with Aβ plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease , 2014, Aging cell.

[13]  John A Wolf,et al.  Transcriptome In Vivo Analysis (TIVA) of spatially defined single cells in intact live mouse and human brain tissue , 2014, Nature Methods.

[14]  Microglia receptors and their implications in the response to amyloid β for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis , 2014, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[15]  B. Giros,et al.  Morphometric characterization of microglial phenotypes in human cerebral cortex , 2014, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[16]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Acute and Chronic Stress-Induced Disturbances of Microglial Plasticity, Phenotype and Function , 2013, Current drug targets.

[17]  F. Walker,et al.  Chronic stress induced remodeling of the prefrontal cortex: structural re-organization of microglia and the inhibitory effect of minocycline. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  D. Choi,et al.  Cellular and Molecular Mediators of Neuroinflammation in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Disease , 2013, Mediators of inflammation.

[19]  M. Ishii,et al.  Layer V cortical neurons require microglial support for survival during postnatal development , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Multistage histopathological image segmentation of Iba1-stained murine microglias in a focal ischemia model: Methodological workflow and expert validation , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  Herbert F. Jelinek,et al.  Quantitating the subtleties of microglial morphology with fractal analysis , 2013, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[22]  A. Aguzzi,et al.  Microglia: Scapegoat, Saboteur, or Something Else? , 2013, Science.

[23]  F. Walker,et al.  Microglial activation in the injured and healthy brain: What are we really talking about? Practical and theoretical issues associated with the measurement of changes in microglial morphology , 2012, Neuroscience.

[24]  Luke Bloy,et al.  Identifying Sub-Populations via Unsupervised Cluster Analysis on Multi-Edge Similarity Graphs , 2012, MICCAI.

[25]  M. Nedergaard,et al.  Real-time analysis of microglial activation and motility in hepatic and hyperammonemic encephalopathy , 2012, Neuroscience.

[26]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[27]  Chris Allan,et al.  OME Remote Objects (OMERO): a flexible, model-driven data management system for experimental biology , 2012, Nature Methods.

[28]  Cleopatra Kozlowski,et al.  An Automated Method to Quantify Microglia Morphology and Application to Monitor Activation State Longitudinally In Vivo , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  S. Fumagalli,et al.  Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice , 2011, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[30]  D. Ruano,et al.  Regional difference in inflammatory response to LPS-injection in the brain: Role of microglia cell density , 2011, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[31]  M. Giustetto,et al.  Synaptic Pruning by Microglia Is Necessary for Normal Brain Development , 2011, Science.

[32]  H. Kettenmann,et al.  Physiology of microglia. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[33]  Ania K. Majewska,et al.  Microglial Interactions with Synapses Are Modulated by Visual Experience , 2010, PLoS biology.

[34]  Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia,et al.  3D reconstruction of histological sections: Application to mammary gland tissue , 2010, Microscopy research and technique.

[35]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference? , 2010, Cell.

[36]  Stephan Saalfeld,et al.  Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions , 2009, Bioinform..

[37]  K. Becker,et al.  The brain expression of genes involved in inflammatory response, the ribosome, and learning and memory is altered by centrally injected lipopolysaccharide in mice , 2009, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[38]  M. Graeber,et al.  Microglia: biology and pathology , 2009, Acta Neuropathologica.

[39]  H. Kettenmann,et al.  Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Changming Sun,et al.  Automated analysis of neurite branching in cultured cortical neurons using HCA‐Vision , 2007, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[41]  F. Crews,et al.  Systemic LPS causes chronic neuroinflammation and progressive neurodegeneration , 2007, Glia.

[42]  Colm Cunningham,et al.  Systemic infections and inflammation affect chronic neurodegeneration , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[43]  M. Block,et al.  Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  Y. Imai,et al.  Visualization of microglia in living tissues using Iba1‐EGFP transgenic mice , 2005, Journal of neuroscience research.

[45]  W. Gan,et al.  ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  F. Helmchen,et al.  Resting Microglial Cells Are Highly Dynamic Surveillants of Brain Parenchyma in Vivo , 2005, Science.

[47]  N. Rooijen,et al.  Microglia Promote the Death of Developing Purkinje Cells , 2004, Neuron.

[48]  F. Gage,et al.  IGF-I instructs multipotent adult neural progenitor cells to become oligodendrocytes , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  E. Camouzis,et al.  On the Dynamics of , 2003 .

[50]  Kortaro Tanaka,et al.  Enhanced Expression of Iba1, Ionized Calcium-Binding Adapter Molecule 1, After Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia In Rat Brain , 2001, Stroke.

[51]  M. Dailey,et al.  Dynamics of microglial activation: A confocal time‐lapse analysis in hippocampal slices , 2001, Glia.

[52]  R. Pawlinski,et al.  Morphology of reactive microglia in the injured cerebral cortex. Fractal analysis and complementary quantitative methods , 2001, Journal of neuroscience research.

[53]  R. Mohney,et al.  Regional Difference in Susceptibility to Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neurotoxicity in the Rat Brain: Role of Microglia , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  A. Sher,et al.  Analysis of Fractalkine Receptor CX3CR1 Function by Targeted Deletion and Green Fluorescent Protein Reporter Gene Insertion , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[55]  K. Baba,et al.  Early axonal and glial pathology in fetal sheep brains with leukomalacia induced by repeated umbilical cord occlusion , 1999, Brain and Development.

[56]  Y. Fukuuchi,et al.  Microglia-specific localisation of a novel calcium binding protein, Iba1. , 1998, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[57]  B. Castellano,et al.  Morphology and distribution of microglial cells in the young and adult mouse cerebellum , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[58]  V. Perry,et al.  Heterogeneity in the distribution and morphology of microglia in the normal adult mouse brain , 1990, Neuroscience.

[59]  R. J. A. Berry,et al.  Cytology and cellular pathology of the nervous system , 1932 .