In the eyes of the beholder: students’ and teachers’ judgments of students’ motivation

Abstract This study was designed to examine the nature and accuracy of teachers’ judgments about students’ motivation related to mathematics. Seventeen fourth- through sixth-grade teachers and 100 of their students participated in this study. Teachers were asked to rate six target students’ motivation four times during the school year. At each of these times students also rated their own motivation. Teachers’ ratings were more stable over time and across mathematics topics and were less differentiated across motivation dimensions than were students’ ratings. The findings suggest that teachers need to pay careful attention to evidence related to children's motivation that might contradict their perceptions and therefore support more effective interventions.

[1]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Validity of Student Evaluations of Instructional Effectiveness: A Comparison of Faculty Self-Evaluations and Evaluations by Their Students. , 1979 .

[2]  Karen B. Givvin,et al.  Can a Teacher Intervention Improve Classroom Practices and Student Motivation in Mathematics , 1998 .

[3]  Lee Jussim,et al.  Social perception and social reality : a reflection-construction model , 1991 .

[4]  J. E. Maddux.  Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. , 1995 .

[5]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[6]  A. Bandura.  Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[7]  B. Zimmerman.  Self-efficacy and educational development , 1995 .

[8]  B. Weiner.  Human Motivation: Metaphors, Theories, and Research , 1980 .

[9]  K. Corby.  Soven, Margot Iris. (1999). Teaching Writing in Middle and Secondary Schools: Theory, Research, and Practice. Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon. , 1999 .

[10]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Perceiving one's own traits and others': The multifaceted self. , 1988 .

[11]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  G. S. Hanna,et al.  High School Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness Compared with Teacher Self-Ratings , 1986 .

[13]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[14]  R. Wood,et al.  Self-Perceived Adequacy of Student Teachers and Its Relationship to Supervising Teacher Ratings: Another Look. , 1989 .

[15]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[16]  James A. Middleton,et al.  A STUDY OF INTRINSIC MOTIVATION IN THE MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM: A PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS APPROACH , 1995 .

[17]  Geoffrey B. Saxe,et al.  The Value (and Convergence) of Practices Suggested by Motivation Research and Promoted by Mathematics Education Reformers. , 1998 .

[18]  Beverly B. Swanson.  Teacher Judgments of First-Graders' Reading Enthusiasm. , 1986 .

[19]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[20]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[21]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Research on the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy and Teacher Expectations. , 1983 .

[22]  J. Meece,et al.  Student Perceptions in the Classroom , 1992 .

[23]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. , 1991 .

[24]  L. Ross.  The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[25]  D. Schunk.  Self-Efficacy and Education and Instruction , 1995 .

[26]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[27]  D. Watson,et al.  The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent?. , 1982 .

[28]  H. Marsh.  Validity of Students' Evaluations of College Teaching: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. , 1982 .

[29]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[30]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Assessing students' theories of success in mathematics: Individual and classroom differences. , 1990 .

[31]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[32]  C. Dweck,et al.  Individual differences in achievement goals among young children. , 1994, Child development.

[33]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer , 1973 .

[34]  Deborah J. Stipek,et al.  Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice , 1992 .

[35]  D. Stipek.  Motivation and instruction. , 1996 .

[36]  L. Ross,et al.  The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process”, in Ed), Advances in Experimental Social New York, pp. . , 1977 .

[37]  Martin V. Covington,et al.  Self-worth and school learning , 1976 .

[38]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[39]  C. Dweck,et al.  Helplessness in early childhood: the role of contingent worth. , 1995, Child development.

[40]  M. Covington.  Making the Grade: A Self-Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform , 1992 .

[41]  D. Schunk.  Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy During Self-Regulated Learning , 1990 .

[42]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[43]  H. Marsh,et al.  Self-Description Questionnaire: Age and sex effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolescent children. , 1984 .