Covert End User Development: A Study of Success

End User Development (EUD) of system applications is typically undertaken by end users for their own, or closely aligned colleagues, business needs. EUD studies have focused on activity that is small scale, is undertaken with management consent and will ultimately be brought into alignment with the organisation’s software development strategy. However, due to the increase pace of today’s organisations EUD activity increasing takes place without the full knowledge or consent of management, such developments can be defined as covert rather than subversive, they emerge in response to the dynamic environments in which today’s organisations operate. This paper reports on a covert EUD project where a wide group of internal and external stakeholders worked collaboratively to drive an organisation’s software development strategy. The research highlights the future inevitability of external stakeholders engaging in end user development as, with the emergence of wiki and blog-like environments, the boundaries of organisations’ technological artifacts become increasingly hard to define.

[1]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[2]  Tanya J. McGill,et al.  The Effect of End User Development on End User Success , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[3]  Robert W. Stone,et al.  The Roles of Computer Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy in Influencing the Computer End-User's Organizational Commitment , 2003, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[4]  Gregory J. Conti,et al.  Why computer scientists should attend hacker conferences , 2005, CACM.

[5]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Converging end-user and corporate computing , 1993, CACM.

[6]  Kian-Lee Tan,et al.  Peer-Based Collaborative Caching and Prefetching in Mobile Broadcast , 2009, Mobile Peer-to-Peer Computing.

[7]  Jesús D. García-Consuegra,et al.  An OO methodology based on the unified process for GIS application development , 2003 .

[8]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-User Computing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[10]  Pierre F. Tiako,et al.  Software Applications: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications , 2009 .

[11]  Peretz Shoval,et al.  The application of FOOM methodology to IFIP conference case study , 2003 .

[12]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Rick Gibson,et al.  A comparison of foreign government computing policies , 1996 .

[14]  Peter Todd,et al.  Strategies for managing EUC on the Web , 1999 .

[15]  Yingxu Wang,et al.  On System Algebra: A Denotational Mathematical Structure for Abstract System Modeling , 2008, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[16]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[17]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis , 1996 .

[18]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process , 2003 .

[19]  Gary Klein,et al.  Lack of Skill Risks to Organizational Technology Learning and Software Project Performance , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[20]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Joan Peckham,et al.  Practicing Software Engineering in the 21st Century , 2003 .

[23]  Lawrence A. West,et al.  Relational Data Modeling for Geographic Information Systems , 1999, J. Database Manag..

[24]  Panagiotis Kanellis,et al.  User Behaving Badly: Phenomena and Paradoxes from an Investigation into Information System Misfit , 2005, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[25]  B. Elango,et al.  The Effect of Attitudes, Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy on End User Performance , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[26]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[27]  Peter Burkhardt,et al.  Social Software Trends in Business: Introduction , 2009 .

[28]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[29]  Song Jiang,et al.  Advanced Operating Systems and Kernel Applications: Techniques and Technologies , 2009 .