Linking root production to aboveground plant characteristics and water table in a temperate bog

Fine root production and its relationships to aboveground plant components and environmental drivers such as water table have been poorly quantified in peatland ecosystems, despite being the primary input of labile carbon to peat soils. We studied the relationship between fine root (< 1 mm) production, aboveground biomass and growing season water table within an ombrotrophic peatland in eastern Ontario. We installed 80 in-growth bags (10 cm diameter) to measure fine root production over the full range of 40 cm in water table depth. The point-intersect method was used to estimate peak aboveground biomass components (total, leaf and stem) for the 0.36 m2 area surrounding each in-growth bag. Mean fine root production was 108 ± 71 g m-2 y-1 and was strongly related to both aboveground biomass and water table. Linear regression analysis showed strong allometric relationships between fine root production and aboveground biomass for shrubs (r2 = 0.61, p < 0.001), suggesting that fine root production estimates can be approximated using aboveground biomass data. Water table had a significant effect on the allocation of biomass to fine roots, leaves and stems with a deeper water table significantly increasing both fine root production at depth and at each depth increment. Shrub biomass allocation to leaves and stems similarly shifted, with greater investment in stems relative to leaves with a deeper water table. As a result, greater fine root biomass was produced per unit leaf biomass in areas with a deeper water table, illustrating an important tradeoff between leaf and fine root tissues in drier conditions. Our results indicate that any drop in water table will likely increase aboveground biomass stocks and the influx of labile carbon to peat soils via fine roots and leaves.

[1]  Allen,et al.  Stand-level allometry in Pinus taeda as affected by irrigation and fertilization. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[2]  W. D. Billings,et al.  Succession and biomass allocation as controlled by Sphagnum in an Alaskan peatland , 1985 .

[3]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status , 1987 .

[4]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[5]  R. Aerts,et al.  Root production and root turnover in two dominant species of wet heathlands , 1989, Oecologia.

[6]  O. Springer-Verlag,et al.  The relation between above- and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability , 1991 .

[7]  I. Backéus.  Production and depth distribution of fine roots in a boreal open bog , 1990 .

[8]  S. Jonasson.  Evaluation of the point intercept method for the estimation of plant biomass , 1988 .

[9]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[10]  D. Eissenstat,et al.  Root anatomy, morphology, and longevity among root orders in Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae). , 2008, American journal of botany.

[11]  S. Bridgham,et al.  RESPONSE OF BOG AND FEN PLANT COMMUNITIES TO WARMING AND WATER‐TABLE MANIPULATIONS , 2000 .

[12]  T. Moore,et al.  Variations in above- and below-ground vascular plant biomass and water table on a temperate ombrotrophic peatland , 2009 .

[13]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Plant Responses to Multiple Environmental FactorsPhysiological ecology provides tools for studying how interacting environmental resources control plant growth , 1987 .

[14]  T. Kohyama,et al.  Below- and above-ground allometries of shade-tolerant seedlings in a Japanese warm-temperate rain forest , 1994 .

[15]  S. Mortimer.  Root length/leaf area ratios of chalk grassland perennials and their importance for competitive interactions , 1992 .

[16]  B. Shipley,et al.  The balanced‐growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation , 2002 .

[17]  K. Nadelhoffer,et al.  Seasonal dynamics of leaf- and root-derived C in arctic tundra mesocosms , 2004 .

[18]  C. Körner,et al.  Dry matter partitioning and root length/leaf area ratios in herbaceous perennial plants with diverse altitudinal distribution , 1987, Oecologia.

[19]  B. Wallén.  Above and below ground dry mass of the three main vascular plants on hummocks on a subarctic peat bog. , 1986 .

[20]  Petteri Vanninen,et al.  Fine root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in southern Finland. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[21]  H. Sjors.  Phyto‐ and necromass above and below ground in a fen , 1991 .

[22]  H. Persson.  Fine-root production, mortality and decomposition in forest ecosystems , 1980, Vegetatio.

[23]  Jukka Turunen,et al.  Estimating carbon accumulation rates of undrained mires in Finland–application to boreal and subarctic regions , 2002 .

[24]  H. Poorter,et al.  The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water : a quantitative review , 2000 .

[25]  P. Reich,et al.  COMPARISONS OF STRUCTURE AND LIFE SPAN IN ROOTS AND LEAVES AMONG TEMPERATE TREES , 2006 .

[26]  J. Thornley.  A Balanced Quantitative Model for Root: Shoot Ratios in Vegetative Plants , 1972 .

[27]  Frank P. Day,et al.  Effects of flooding on root and shoot production of bald cypress in large experimental enclosures , 1992 .

[28]  E. Gorham.  Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[29]  T. Saarinen.  Biomass and production of two vascular plants in a boreal mesotrophic fen , 1996 .

[30]  J. Bhatti,et al.  Drainage affects tree growth and C and N dynamics in a minerotrophic peatland. , 2007, Ecology.

[31]  F. Bormann,et al.  The Distribution of Dry Matter Growth between Shoot and Roots in Loblolly Pine , 1970, Botanical Gazette.

[32]  A. Prokushkin,et al.  Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes , 2006 .

[33]  T. Moore,et al.  Effects of Water Table Drawdown on Root Production and Aboveground Biomass in a Boreal Bog , 2009, Ecosystems.

[34]  F. Dijkstra,et al.  Plant biomass influences rhizosphere priming effects on soil organic matter decomposition in two differently managed soils , 2006 .

[35]  Raija Laiho,et al.  Changes in root biomass after water‐level drawdown on pine mires in southern Finland , 1996 .

[36]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes , 1996, Oecologia.

[37]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review , 2000 .

[38]  Christopher Neill,et al.  Comparison of Soil Coring and Ingrowth Methods for Measuring Belowground Production , 1992 .

[39]  Tim R. Moore,et al.  Fine-scale vegetation distribution in a cool temperate peatland , 2006 .

[40]  L. Finér,et al.  The Ingrowth Bag Method in Measuring Root Production on Peatland Sites , 2000 .