Challenges of including human exposure to chemicals in food packaging as a new exposure pathway in life cycle impact assessment

PurposeLimiting exposure to potentially toxic chemicals in food packaging can lead to environmental impact trade-offs. No available tool, however, considers trade-offs between environmental impacts of packaging systems and exposure to potentially toxic chemicals in food packaging. This study therefore explores the research needs for extending life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to include exposure to chemicals in food packaging.MethodsThe LCIA framework for human toxicity was extended for the first time to include consumer exposure to chemicals in food packaging through the product intake fraction (PiF) metric. The related exposure pathway was added to LCIA without other modifications to the existing toxicity characterization framework used by USEtox®, i.e., effect factor derivation. The developed method was applied to a high impact polystyrene (HIPS) container case study with the functional unit of providing 1 kg of yogurt in single servings. Various exposure scenarios were considered, including an evidence-based scenario using concentration data and a migration model. Human toxicity impact scores in comparative toxic units (CTUh) for the use stage were evaluated and then compared to human toxicity impact scores from a conventional LCIA methodology.Results and discussionData allowed toxicity characterization of use stage exposure to only seven chemicals in HIPS out of fourty-four identified. Data required were the initial concentration of chemicals in food packaging, chemical mass transfer from packaging into food, and relevant toxicity information. Toxicity characterization demonstrated that the combined CTUh for HIPS material acquisition, manufacturing, and disposal stages exceeded the toxicity scores related to consumer exposure to previously estimated concentrations of the seven characterizable chemicals in HIPS, by about two orders of magnitude. The CTUh associated with consumer exposure became relevant when migration was above 0.1% of the European regulatory levels. Results emphasize missing data for chemical concentrations in food contact materials and a need to expand the current USEtox method for effect factor derivation (e.g., to consider endocrine disruption, mixture toxicity, background exposure, and thresholds when relevant).ConclusionsAn LCIA method was developed to include consumer exposure to chemicals in food packaging. Further study is required to assess realistic scenarios to inform decisions and policies, such as circular economy, which can lead to trade-offs between environmental impacts and potentially toxic chemicals in packaging. To apply the developed method, data regarding occurrence, concentration, and toxicity of chemicals in food packaging are needed. Revisiting the derivation of effect factors in future work could improve the interpretation of human toxicity impact scores.

[1]  Peter Fantke,et al.  Multi-pathway exposure modeling of chemicals in cosmetics with application to shampoo. , 2016, Environment international.

[2]  T. Begley,et al.  Updated evaluation of the migration of styrene monomer and oligomers from polystyrene food contact materials to foods and food simulants , 2014, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[3]  Daniel Vallero,et al.  Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  J. Bonde,et al.  Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and human fetal growth: A systematic review , 2015, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[5]  J. Muncke,et al.  Food contact substances and chemicals of concern: a comparison of inventories , 2014, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[6]  Sandra Belboom,et al.  A life cycle assessment of injectable drug primary packaging: comparing the traditional process in glass vials with the closed vial technology (polymer vials) , 2011 .

[7]  O. Piringer,et al.  Plastic packaging materials for food : barrier function, mass transport, quality assurance, and legislation , 2000 .

[8]  H A Leslie,et al.  Propelling plastics into the circular economy - weeding out the toxics first. , 2016, Environment international.

[9]  Simoneau Catherine,et al.  Practical guidelines on the application of migration modelling for the estimation of specific migration , 2015 .

[10]  L. Castle,et al.  Spectra for the Identification of Additives in Food Packaging , 1998 .

[11]  Y. Tsumura,et al.  Estimated daily intake of plasticizers in 1-week duplicate diet samples following regulation of DEHP-containing PVC gloves in Japan , 2003, Food additives and contaminants.

[12]  A. Belyanovskaya,et al.  Improvement of calculations of the total Characterization factor in the USEtox model including a regional approach , 2019, Global NEST International Conference on Environmental Science & Technology.

[13]  Peter Fantke,et al.  Defining Product Intake Fraction to Quantify and Compare Exposure to Consumer Products. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  J. J. Clary,et al.  3. Human Toxicity , 2013 .

[15]  Heather M. Alger,et al.  Data gaps in toxicity testing of chemicals allowed in food in the United States. , 2013, Reproductive toxicology.

[16]  A. Kortenkamp.  Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters and their implications for regulatory thresholds in chemical risk assessment. , 2014, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[17]  Hui Peng,et al.  Ubiquitous Occurrence of Fluorotelomer Alcohols in Eco-Friendly Paper-Made Food-Contact Materials and Their Implication for Human Exposure. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Tim Hogg,et al.  Exposure assessment of chemicals from packaging materials in foods: a review , 2007 .

[19]  J. Jaakkola,et al.  The Role of Exposure to Phthalates from Polyvinyl Chloride Products in the Development of Asthma and Allergies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  J. Muncke,et al.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals and other substances of concern in food contact materials: An updated review of exposure, effect and risk assessment , 2011, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[21]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Peter Fantke,et al.  High-throughput exposure modeling to support prioritization of chemicals in personal care products. , 2016, Chemosphere.

[23]  H. R. Thorsheim,et al.  RECYCLED PLASTICS FOR FOOD PACKAGING , 1993 .

[24]  Agnes L Karmaus,et al.  Evaluation of food-relevant chemicals in the ToxCast high-throughput screening program. , 2016, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[25]  T Begley,et al.  Evaluation of migration models that might be used in support of regulations for food-contact plastics , 2005, Food additives and contaminants.

[26]  P K T Oldring,et al.  Development of a new modelling tool (FACET) to assess exposure to chemical migrants from food packaging , 2014, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[27]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Indoor Air Pollutant Exposure for Life Cycle Assessment: Regional Health Impact Factors for Households. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  M. Hauschild,et al.  USEtox human exposure and toxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties , 2011 .

[29]  Anders Branth Pedersen,et al.  The influence of resource strategies on childhood phthalate exposure--the role of REACH in a zero waste society. , 2014, Environment international.

[30]  Peter Fantke,et al.  A review of models for near-field exposure pathways of chemicals in consumer products. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[32]  Lise Laurin,et al.  A life cycle assessment of packaging options for contrast media delivery: comparing polymer bottle vs. glass bottle , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[33]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[34]  Carolyn Vickers,et al.  Knowns and unknowns on burden of disease due to chemicals: a systematic review , 2011, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[35]  John F. Wambaugh,et al.  High-throughput dietary exposure predictions for chemical migrants from food contact substances for use in chemical prioritization. , 2017, Environment international.

[36]  M. Hauschild,et al.  USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties , 2011 .

[37]  D. Dewey,et al.  Phthalate exposure and childrens neurodevelopment: A systematic review. , 2015, Environmental research.

[38]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots , 2009 .

[39]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Risk-Based High-Throughput Chemical Screening and Prioritization using Exposure Models and in Vitro Bioactivity Assays. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Maurus Biedermann,et al.  Assurance of safety of recycled paperboard for food packaging through comprehensive analysis of potential migrants is unrealistic. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[41]  Peter Fantke,et al.  From incremental to fundamental substitution in chemical alternatives assessment , 2015 .

[42]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[43]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2019, CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering.

[44]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  A parsimonious model for the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) encapsulated in products , 2016 .

[45]  Barbara L. Ley,et al.  Multiple Exposures: Scientific Controversy, the Media, and Public Responses to Bisphenol A , 2011 .

[46]  N. Pelletier,et al.  Life Cycle Thinking, Measurement and Management for Food System Sustainability. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Konrad Saur,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment , 1997 .

[48]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Integrating Human Indoor Air Pollutant Exposure within Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[49]  T. Begley,et al.  Food packaging made from recycled polymers: functional barrier considerations. , 1995 .

[50]  Lei Huang,et al.  Coupled near-field and far-field exposure assessment framework for chemicals in consumer products. , 2016, Environment international.

[51]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Human-Toxicological Effect and Damage Factors of Carcinogenic and Noncarcinogenic Chemicals for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[52]  R. Kruse,et al.  Decrease in Anogenital Distance among Male Infants with Prenatal Phthalate Exposure , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[53]  Charles P. Rader,et al.  Plastics, rubber, and paper recycling : a pragmatic approach : developed from a symposium sponsored by the divisions of Polymer Chemistry ... [et al.] at the 208th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, August 21-25, 1994 , 1995 .

[54]  Anna Maria Ferrari,et al.  Human health characterization factors of nano-TiO2 for indoor and outdoor environments , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[55]  Rolf U. Halden,et al.  Cord Serum Concentrations of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in Relation to Weight and Size at Birth , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[56]  Heather M. Alger,et al.  Looking Back to Look Forward: A Review of FDA's Food Additives Safety Assessment and Recommendations for Modernizing its Program. , 2013, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[57]  William E. Franklin,et al.  LCA — How it came about , 1996 .

[58]  Martin Scheringer,et al.  Food packaging and migration of food contact materials: will epidemiologists rise to the neotoxic challenge? , 2014, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[59]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment , 2015 .