Why don't we perceive our brain states?

Abstract The major part of this paper is devoted to the issue of how to bridge the gap between perception and action. First, the traditional view of the perception-action relationship is addressed. This view assumes that there are two different and incommensurate coding systems for afferent and efferent patterns (sensory and motor coding). Next, a different view is proposed that invokes the common coding of afferent and efferent patterns. One of the implications of this view is that actions can be controlled and guided by representations of distal events. There is some support for this view from two different sources: the first is nineteenth-century psychology of the will. the other comes from more recent experimental evidence. Some findings from experiments on sensorimotor synchronisation and on the Simon effect are discussed with reference to the notion of distal focusing in action control. In conclusion, the issue raised in the title is addressed. As a tentative answer it is suggested that the reason w...

[1]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[2]  Paul Fraisse,et al.  Multisensory Aspects of Rhythm , 1981 .

[3]  E. Brunswik.  Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. , 1955, Psychological review.

[4]  D. W. Massaro,et al.  An Information-Processing Analysis of Perception and Action , 1990 .

[5]  E T Klemmer,et al.  Sequences of responses to signals encoded in time only. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[6]  A. Sanders.  20 Stage Analysis of Reaction Processes , 1980 .

[7]  W. Prinz.  A common-coding approach to perception and action , 1990 .

[8]  P. Viviani,et al.  Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Relationships and modules within language perception and production: An introduction , 1987 .

[10]  W. Prinz.  Ideomotorik und Isomorphie , 1985 .

[11]  E. Brunswik,et al.  Distal focussing of perception: Size-constancy in a representative sample of situations. , 1944 .

[12]  Knight Dunlap,et al.  Reaction to rhythmic stimuli with attempt to synchronize. , 1910 .

[13]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  J. Kelso,et al.  Toward a theory of apractic syndromes , 1981, Brain and Language.

[15]  L. G. Gawryszewski,et al.  What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? , 1986 .

[16]  J R Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  J R Simon,et al.  Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  William P. Alston,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information , 1985 .

[19]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Modes of Linkage Between Perception and Action , 1984 .

[20]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[21]  R. Gregory.  How Can Perceptual Science Help the Handicapped? , 1992, Perception.

[22]  A. White,et al.  The Causal Theory of Perception , 1961 .

[23]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The Conceptual Framework of Psychology , 1954 .

[24]  Betty Tuller,et al.  A “Dynamic Pattern” Perspective on the Control and Coordination of Movement , 1983 .

[25]  Paul Fraisse,et al.  L'anticipation de stimulus rythmiques: Vitesse d'établissement et précision de la synchronisation , 1966 .